Every category where a model named Netskope One for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SASE platforms	Network and edge	2%	7 of 43	10%	30	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Netskope One yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Netskope One across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	1	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	2	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	3	0	5
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	3	0	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	0	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels2

Paraphrase13 labels1

Comparative28 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained8 labelsNone

Scale-constrained13 labels2

Negative17 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative95 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd usually recommend Netskope as the best starting point for SASE/SSE” GPT-5.4 mini · SASE · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best SSE depth in the market — strongest data loss prevention (DLP)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SASE · comparative prompt · first choice

“Do you need deep data‑protection (CASB/DLP) and compliance reporting? - Yes → Netskope” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SASE · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“If you need deep app-level controls and advanced DLP, look at Netskope” GPT-5.4 mini · SASE · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“these lean toward large-enterprise and many have immature SD-WAN, making them less ideal for mid-market consolidation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SASE · direct prompt · soft negative

“Netskope: Users report sluggish, inadequate, and nearly ineffective customer support with slow response times” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SASE · negative prompt · soft negative

“Customer support is repeatedly flagged as the biggest weakness” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SASE · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Netskope One, over the 95 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Netskope One was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange90 of 9510Not in the top three

Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE71 of 9517Not in the top three

Fortinet FortiSASE70 of 951Not in the top three

Cloudflare One67 of 9514Not in the top three

Cato Networks54 of 9513Not in the top three

Check Point Harmony SASE23 of 950Not in the top three

Cisco Secure Access22 of 951Not in the top three

Cisco21 of 950Not in the top three

Cato SASE Cloud20 of 958Not in the top three

Versa SASE20 of 950Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Netskope One. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 75 of the 95 answers that named Netskope One and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com49

sase.cloud42

fortinet.com29

crn.com28

techrepublic.com28

macronetservices.com24

pickmysoft.com24

blog.openvpn.net22

sasecompare.com22

cyberhaven.com21

289 of the 289 domain citations in answers naming Netskope One came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/single-vendor-sase39

techrepublic.com/article/secure-access-service-edge-platforms28

crn.com/news/security/2024/palo-alto-networks-cato-netskope-top-gartner-s-sase-magic-quadr26

macronetservices.com/sase-leaders-vendors-comparison24

pickmysoft.com/blog/best-secure-access-service-edge-sase-platforms24

blog.openvpn.net/best-sase-solution22

cyberhaven.com/blog/top-sase-solutions21

sase.cloud/guides/sase-vendor-comparison21

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Netskope One

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Netskope One; a claim can dispute any of them.

Netskope 20Netskope (Netskope One) 2Netskope SASE 2Netskope (One SASE) 1Netskope ONE 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Netskope One's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Netskope One, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at netskope.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.