AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Zscaler Private Access · October 2026 Edition
Zscaler · 3 categories · Ranked

Zscaler Private Access

210Judge labels
37First choices
72Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
53% in ZTNA for enterprise buyers
Rank 6 of 66 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 45% of its 51 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Zscaler Private Access →
By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business.
In ztna · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zscaler Private Access for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Zero trust network accessNetwork and edge3%6 of 6645%51criticized challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
SASE platformsNetwork and edge2%8 of 450%2under 10 labels · led by Cato Networks at 35%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
MicrosegmentationNetwork and edge2%9 of 940%14accepted challenger

Movement

Since September 2026, Zscaler Private Access held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · ZTNA · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 54 → 42 of 42
Mid-market▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 6 of 64, unchanged
Enterprise▼−6Since September 2026: 57% → 51%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
51%from 57% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 1 of 44, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
SASE0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 34 → 8 of 45
Microsegmentation0%2%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.New this editionRank 9 of 94, unchanged
ZTNA2%4%▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 6 of 66, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Zscaler Private Access across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.512306
GPT-5.4 mini21104
Gemini 3.5 Flash10045
Perplexity Sonar11114
Grok 4.2013037
Mistral Small32106
DeepSeek V4 Flash10045
Llama 4 Maverick01203
Qwen 3.7 Flash03025
Kimi K211035
GLM 4.7 FlashX10135
MiniMax M2.503115
GPT-6 Luna01203
Muse Glimmer 30B01124

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct39 labels14
Paraphrase42 labels16
Comparative43 labels20not counted in share
Budget-constrained29 labels5
Scale-constrained29 labels2
Negative28 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative210 labels in all, every segment counted; 37 of the 58 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Zscaler Private Access is the market-leading ZTNA solution, delivering inside-out connectivity that never exposes applications to the internet” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ZTNA · comparative prompt · first choice
“Complex, global enterprise needing high compliance | Zscaler Private Access | Robust, highly certified, and built for massive scale.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ZTNA · comparative prompt · first choice
“Zscaler is often treated as the canonical pure-play ZTNA vendor... Choose Zscaler if you want a widely recognized ZTNA leader” GPT-5.4 mini · ZTNA · comparative prompt · first choice
“The global leader in SASE (Secure Access Service Edge). ZPA is the dominant choice for large enterprises and government agencies” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ZTNA · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Zscaler for mid-market: It's powerful but designed for Fortune 500 scale—complex, expensive, and often overkill” Kimi K2 · ZTNA · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“ZTNA Vendors to Approach with Caution ... Zscaler ... CVE-2025-54982: A SAML authentication bypass” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ZTNA · negative prompt · hard negative
“CVE-2025-54982: SAML authentication bypass due to failure to validate signed assertions” Kimi K2 · ZTNA · negative prompt · hard negative
“When to avoid: Small/mid-sized businesses or cost-sensitive setups” Grok 4.20 · ZTNA · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zscaler Private Access, over the 209 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zscaler Private Access was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access89 of 2091Not among the top eight
Netskope Private Access68 of 2091Not among the top eight
Cisco Secure Access30 of 2090Not among the top eight
Microsoft Entra Private Access29 of 2093Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zscaler Private Access. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 195 of the 209 answers that named Zscaler Private Access and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org79
cybersecuritynews.com61
zendikt.com58
expertinsights.com56
gartner.com51
portnox.com51
petronellatech.com48
venn.com44
zscaler.comYour site43
akamai.com40

488 of the 531 domain citations in answers naming Zscaler Private Access came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

zscaler.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Zscaler Private Access takes 3% of first choices and Twingate takes 39%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ztna solution”
1
Position for “ztna solutions”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
590 a month (“zscaler private access”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
16 a month
Its company's site
zscaler.com shared with Zscaler's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site
about 103,886 a month
Searches its site ranks for
10,238 · 1,697 in the top three
Sites linking to it
19,207
Paid Google search
16 searches its ads show for, about 426 clicks and $9,116 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 110 text, 10 video · 66 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2023, as ZSCALER, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 104 in the year, 16 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
3%
rank 6 of 66 in ZTNA
Segment leader
39%
Twingate
First choices
37 across its categories
Named in
209 answers
Its own site cited
in 195 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Zscaler Private Access

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Zscaler Private Access; a claim can dispute any of them.
Zscaler 32Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) 17Zscaler ZPA 2Zscaler (Private Access) 1Zscaler (ZPA - Zscaler Private Access) 1Zscaler (ZTNA / Internet Security Cloud) 1Zscaler (Zero Trust Exchange) 1Zscaler Private Access / Zero Trust Exchange 1

Follow Zscaler Private Access

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Zscaler is the company behind Zscaler Private Access.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Private Clouds are a logical grouping of Private Cloud Controller groups, App Connector groups, Private Service Edge for Private Access (ZPA) groups, and log receivers.
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Zscaler Private Access's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: help.zscaler.com/zpa/about-private-clouds, help.zscaler.com/zpa/editing-private-clouds, help.zscaler.com/zpa/configuring-private-clouds, help.zscaler.com/zpa/about-private-access-roles, help.zscaler.com/zpa/what-zscaler-private-access. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zscaler Private Access's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zscaler Private Access, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zscaler Private Access by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Zscaler Private Access is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Zscaler Private Access, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zscaler.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.