AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Network and edge › ZTNA › Twingate vs Zscaler Private Access
Zero trust network access · October 2026 Edition

Twingate vs Zscaler Private Access

Seven of fourteen models named Twingate first on the direct prompt; one named Zscaler Private Access. Twingate was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Zscaler Private Access by fourteen and Twingate carries 44 labels and Zscaler Private Access 51, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Twingate

endorsed leader

Named in three categories this edition.

Zscaler Private Access

criticized challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share39%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate2%45%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#6A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4451A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Twingate reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Cloudflare One was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Twingate vs Cloudflare One · Twingate vs Cato Networks · Twingate vs NordLayer

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the zero trust network access page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TwingateFirst choices, of fourteen modelsZscaler Private Access
Direct715 against Zscaler Private Access
Paraphrase1015 against Zscaler Private Access
Comparative08
Budget-constrained401 against Zscaler Private Access
Scale-constrained404 against Zscaler Private Access
Negative001 against Twingate · 8 against Zscaler Private Access
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Twingate and Zscaler Private Access were named in the same answer eighty-five times, of the 143 answers naming Twingate and the 209 naming Zscaler Private Access. In those answers Zscaler Private Access took the first choice fourteen times and Twingate thirty-four.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Twingate and Zscaler Private Access stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Twingate Zscaler Private Access first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Twingate on the left and Zscaler Private Access on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Twingate and Zscaler Private Access stood in it.

Twingate first, Zscaler Private Access an alternative

7 of 14 modelsZscaler Private Access was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Cato Networks, Twingate alternatives: Cloudflare One, NordLayer
Gemini 3.5 FlashTwingate alternatives: Cato Networks, Check Point Harmony SASE, Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access
Grok 4.1 FastCloudflare One, Twingate alternatives: Cato Networks, Microsoft Entra Private Access, OpenVPN CloudConnexa
DeepSeek V4 FlashCloudflare One, Twingate alternatives: Cato Networks, Check Point Harmony SASE, NordLayer
Qwen 3.7 FlashTwingate alternatives: Cloudflare One, Fortinet Universal ZTNA
Kimi K2Cloudflare One, Twingate alternatives: Cato Networks, Netskope Private Access, NordLayer, Zscaler Private Access
Muse Glimmer 30BCloudflare One, Twingate alternatives: Cato Networks, Check Point Harmony SASE, Fortinet Universal ZTNA

Zscaler Private Access first, Twingate not the choice

1 of 14 modelsTwingate was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniZscaler Private Access alternatives: Cloudflare One, Netskope One SSE, Prisma Access

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Mistral SmallCheck Point Harmony SASE, Netskope Private Access alternatives: Cloudflare One, Twingate, Zscaler Private Access
GPT-6 LunaCloudflare One alternatives: Microsoft Entra Private Access, Twingate

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Perplexity SonarCloudflare One, NordLayer alternatives: Cato Networks, Cisco Secure Access, Portnox
Llama 4 MaverickCato Networks alternatives: Check Point Harmony SASE, OpenVPN CloudConnexa
GLM 4.7 FlashXCato Networks alternatives: Check Point Harmony SASE, Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiZTNA
MiniMax M2.5Cato Networks, Cloudflare One alternatives: Axis Security, Banyan Security, OpenVPN CloudConnexa

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Twingate leads by thirty points.
Twingate30%#2 of 10
Zscaler Private Access0%#10 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Twingate leads by thirty-six points.
Twingate39%#1 of 11
Zscaler Private Access3%#6 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Zscaler Private Access leads at enterprise.
Zscaler Private Access53%#1 of 8
Twingate2%#6 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Twingate

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“MDM deployment across NinjaRMM, Intune, and Jamf Pro can be complex” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Pure ZTNA (e.g., Twingate, Tailscale, Cloudflare Zero Trust): Great if you just want to kill the VPN and grant app-level access. Low overhead, easy to implement.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Midmarket teams with limited IT resources get the best return from Twingate or Cloudflare One — both deploy in hours, not months.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Twingate (Best for Modern VPN Replacement & Dev Teams) ... incredibly fast, lightweight, and can be deployed in minutes” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about Zscaler Private Access

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid Zscaler for mid-market: It's powerful but designed for Fortune 500 scale—complex, expensive, and often overkill” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“ZTNA Vendors to Approach with Caution ... Zscaler ... CVE-2025-54982: A SAML authentication bypass” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“CVE-2025-54982: SAML authentication bypass due to failure to validate signed assertions” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Zscaler Private Access is the market-leading ZTNA solution, delivering inside-out connectivity that never exposes applications to the internet” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Complex, global enterprise needing high compliance | Zscaler Private Access | Robust, highly certified, and built for massive scale.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Zscaler is often treated as the canonical pure-play ZTNA vendor... Choose Zscaler if you want a widely recognized ZTNA leader” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.