IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Twingate · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Twingate

124Judge labels
25First choices
7Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
31% in ZTNA for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 71 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 44 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentA small-business product: leader at small business, not named at enterprise.
In ztna · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Twingate for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Zero trust network accessNetwork and edge28%2 of 710%44accepted challenger
Next-generation firewallsNetwork and edge0%70 of 1000%1under 10 labels · led by Fortinet FortiGate at 61%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Twingate yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Twingate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.512104
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash22004
Perplexity Sonar03104
Grok 4.1 Fast05005
Mistral Small11103
DeepSeek V4 Flash13004
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash22004
Kimi K223005
GLM 4.7 FlashX22105
MiniMax M2.512104

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct23 labels8
Paraphrase25 labels11
Comparative25 labels12not counted in share
Budget-constrained27 labels4
Scale-constrained13 labels2
Negative11 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative124 labels in all, every segment counted; 25 of the 41 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Twingate is a software-first remote access platform using a software-defined perimeter, best for small and mid-market teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ZTNA · direct prompt · first choice
“Twingate (free tier) or CloudConnexa (5‑seat free) | Very low price, simple SaaS, quick setup” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ZTNA · budget prompt · first choice
“Rating: 4.8/5 (highest rated) ... For SMBs/Fast Deployment: Twingate or Cloudflare” Kimi K2 · ZTNA · comparative prompt · first choice
“Twingate is arguably the best overall choice for the mid-market” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ZTNA · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Twingate, over the 124 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Twingate was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Check Point Harmony SASE60 of 1241Not in the top three
Tailscale60 of 1241Not in the top three
Zscaler Private Access50 of 12415Not in the top three
NordLayer34 of 1241Not in the top three
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access32 of 1241Not in the top three
Cloudflare Access24 of 1242Not in the top three
OpenVPN CloudConnexa22 of 1241Not in the top three
Zscaler20 of 1242Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Twingate. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 105 of the 124 answers that named Twingate and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cybersecuritynews.com80
petronellatech.com69
cyberpress.org59
aimultiple.com51
expertinsights.com36
portnox.com32
startwithidentity.com30
meshwg.com27
itbusinessedge.com26
costbench.com23

433 of the 433 domain citations in answers naming Twingate came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Twingate

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Twingate; a claim can dispute any of them.
Twingate Starter 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Twingate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Twingate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at twingate.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack