AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Network and edge › ZTNA › OpenVPN CloudConnexa vs Tailscale
Zero trust network access · October 2026 Edition

OpenVPN CloudConnexa vs Tailscale

Zero of fourteen models named OpenVPN CloudConnexa first on the direct prompt; zero named Tailscale. OpenVPN CloudConnexa was named by eight of the fourteen models and Tailscale by twelve and OpenVPN CloudConnexa carries 11 labels and Tailscale 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.

OpenVPN CloudConnexa

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Tailscale

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share3%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%24%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1125A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, OpenVPN CloudConnexa reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Cloudflare One was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Twingate vs OpenVPN CloudConnexa · Twingate vs Tailscale · Cloudflare One vs OpenVPN CloudConnexa

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the zero trust network access page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OpenVPN CloudConnexaFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTailscale
Direct00
Paraphrase002 against Tailscale
Comparative001 against Tailscale
Budget-constrained202 against Tailscale
Scale-constrained01
Negative011 against Tailscale
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, OpenVPN CloudConnexa and Tailscale were named in the same answer sixteen times, of the 35 answers naming OpenVPN CloudConnexa and the 98 naming Tailscale. In those answers Tailscale took the first choice one time and OpenVPN CloudConnexa zero.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where OpenVPN CloudConnexa and Tailscale stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
OpenVPN CloudConnexa Tailscale first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OpenVPN CloudConnexa on the left and Tailscale on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where OpenVPN CloudConnexa and Tailscale stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastCloudflare One, Twingate alternatives: Cato Networks, Microsoft Entra Private Access, OpenVPN CloudConnexa
Llama 4 MaverickCato Networks alternatives: Check Point Harmony SASE, OpenVPN CloudConnexa
MiniMax M2.5Cato Networks, Cloudflare One alternatives: Axis Security, Banyan Security, OpenVPN CloudConnexa

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Cato Networks, Twingate alternatives: Cloudflare One, NordLayer
GPT-5.4 miniZscaler Private Access alternatives: Cloudflare One, Netskope One SSE, Prisma Access
Gemini 3.5 FlashTwingate alternatives: Cato Networks, Check Point Harmony SASE, Cloudflare One, Microsoft Entra Private Access
Perplexity SonarCloudflare One, NordLayer alternatives: Cato Networks, Cisco Secure Access, Portnox
Mistral SmallCheck Point Harmony SASE, Netskope Private Access alternatives: Cloudflare One, Twingate, Zscaler Private Access
DeepSeek V4 FlashCloudflare One, Twingate alternatives: Cato Networks, Check Point Harmony SASE, NordLayer
Qwen 3.7 FlashTwingate alternatives: Cloudflare One, Fortinet Universal ZTNA
Kimi K2Cloudflare One, Twingate alternatives: Cato Networks, Netskope Private Access, NordLayer, Zscaler Private Access
GLM 4.7 FlashXCato Networks alternatives: Check Point Harmony SASE, Cloudflare One, Fortinet FortiZTNA
GPT-6 LunaCloudflare One alternatives: Microsoft Entra Private Access, Twingate
Muse Glimmer 30BCloudflare One, Twingate alternatives: Cato Networks, Check Point Harmony SASE, Fortinet Universal ZTNA

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Tailscale leads by seven points.
Tailscale8%#3 of 10
OpenVPN CloudConnexa2%#5 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: OpenVPN CloudConnexa leads at mid-market.
OpenVPN CloudConnexa3%#5 of 11
Tailscale2%#7 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
OpenVPN CloudConnexa is not named for this buyer.
OpenVPN CloudConnexa—not named
Tailscale0%#– of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about OpenVPN CloudConnexa

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Best Overall for Small Budgets ... Recommendation: Start with CloudConnexa.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“The best ZTNA solution for a company with a limited budget is OpenVPN CloudConnexa” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Specifically designed for small and mid-sized businesses without enterprise budgets” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · alternative

What the models said about Tailscale

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Good for developer-heavy environments, but operates more at network layer (Layer 4) than true application-layer zero trust” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“may lack full enterprise ZTNA compliance (e.g., advanced posture or auditing) without self-hosting effort” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“License concerns: 2024 BSL (Business Source License) switch raised community concerns” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Pure ZTNA (e.g., Twingate, Tailscale, Cloudflare Zero Trust): Great if you just want to kill the VPN and grant app-level access. Low overhead, easy to implement.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Tailscale: For rapid deployment and ease of use (avoid if you need strict compliance granularities)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Best for developer-friendly private networking: Tailscale, for engineering teams that need fast, lightweight secure remote access.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.