| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity governance | Identity and access | 2% | 18 of 76 | 49% | 59 | criticized challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce identity and SSO | Identity and access | 0% | 32 of 44 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID at 46% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Non-human identity management | Identity and access | 0% | 101 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by JumpCloud at 14% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGA | 5% | 2% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 18 of 76 |
| Workforce identity | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 32 of 44 |
| NHI management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 101 of 128, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 8 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“usually the safest "enterprise standard" pick when you need deep governance, certifications, and lifecycle controls across a large app estate” Perplexity Sonar · IGA · comparative prompt · first choice
“SailPoint and Okta are the top recommendations due to their scalability, strong governance features, and broad market adoption.” Mistral Small · IGA · direct prompt · first choice
“SailPoint IdentityNow is the market‑leading IGA platform, offering deep governance ... in a SaaS model.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · IGA · comparative prompt · first choice
“For full-scale regulated governance, choose SailPoint (depth/AI) or Saviynt (convergence/ERP)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · IGA · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"If you are under 500 employees, avoid enterprise giants like SailPoint; the administrative overhead will crush your team."” Muse Glimmer 30B · IGA · negative prompt · hard negative
“I would generally avoid SailPoint and Saviynt if budget is the primary constraint” GPT-5.4 mini · IGA · budget prompt · hard negative
“avoid legacy enterprise leaders like SailPoint (IdentityIQ) or Saviynt.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid SailPoint/Saviynt unless you have 2,000+ employees” Kimi K2 · IGA · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 199 of the 214 answers that named SailPoint Identity Security Cloud and are not a share of its labels.
664 of the 664 domain citations in answers naming SailPoint Identity Security Cloud came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template or tool | 5,732 | 2 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Blog | 343 | 13 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| News or press | 193 | 4 | 2026-09-22 | SIEM | |
| Case study | 105 | 0 | 2026-03-24 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 46 | 0 | 2026-06-24 | GRC | |
| Conference or event | 42 | 4 | 2026-10-05 | ||
| Comparison | 33 | 0 | 2026-06-18 | ||
| Report or ebook | 14 | 0 | 2025-08-14 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 7 | 0 | 2023-06-28 | ||
| Podcast or video | 6 | 0 | 2023-12-04 |
As the event pages on sailpoint.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page sailpoint.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What SailPoint Identity Security Cloud's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sailpoint.com, trust.sailpoint.com, sailpoint.com/solutions/dora, sailpoint.com/customers, sailpoint.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SailPoint Identity Security Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SailPoint Identity Security Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: