Non-human identity management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “non-human identity management platform”, and as “machine identity and service account security tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each. Added to the September 2026 Edition; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
20%
Contested · Aembit 8%
20CyberArk Identity Security Platform08Aembit08HashiCorp Vault65others
20% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01CyberArk Identity Security Platform20%
CyberArk Identity Security Platform20%02Aembit8%
Aembit8%03HashiCorp Vault8%
HashiCorp Vault8%04Venafi6%
Venafi6%05Akeyless4%
Akeyless4%06Astrix Security4%
Astrix Security4%07Oasis Security4%
Oasis Security4%08SailPoint4%
SailPoint4%09Saviynt Identity Cloud2%
Saviynt Identity Cloud2%10CyberArk Conjur2%
CyberArk Conjur2%11Okta2%
Okta2%12Entro Security0%
Entro Security0%13Microsoft Entra ID0%
Microsoft Entra ID0%14Azure Key Vault0%
Azure Key Vault0%15AWS Secrets Manager0%
AWS Secrets Manager0%What they warned about
Four of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Microsoft Entra ID54%
7 of 13 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid ... **Microsoft Entra ID**: Per-user ($6-9/user/month), plus add-on modules” MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt
HashiCorp Vault32%
12 of 38 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid platforms that meter by "Active Secrets," "Number of Clients," or "API calls" (such as AWS Secrets Manager or HashiCorp Vault)” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
CyberArk Identity Security Platform17%
6 of 36 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid ... **CyberArk**: Custom quote, module-based” MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt
Okta33%
6 of 18 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid ... **Okta**: Per-user + modules” MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
80 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1313 links across 298 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
41 answers · 46 citations · 12 models
32 answers · 66 citations · 13 models
vendor site · One Identity32 answers · 47 citations · 10 models
28 answers · 36 citations · 12 models
28 answers · 36 citations · 12 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
24 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
24 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Akeyless21 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Zluri17 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
37 answers · 11 models
26 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 6 models
15 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 6 models
14 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best non-human identity management platform”, “non-human identity management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CyberArk cyberark.com CyberArk Identity Security Platform 20%, CyberArk Conjur 2% | 22% | 100 | 22,200 | 1,253 | 147,793 company | $62 | 0 | |
| SailPoint sailpoint.com SailPoint Machine Identity Security 6%, SailPoint 4% | 10% | 46 | 22,200 | 1,049 | 58,881 company | 46 | ||
| Aembit aembit.io | 8% | 50 | 590 | 4 | 3,239 | 0 | ||
| HashiCorp Vault hashicorp.com | 8% | 357 | 5,400 | 317 | 173,934 | $26 | 29 | |
| Venafi venafi.com | 6% | 129 | 3,600 | 91 | 7,407 | |||
| Akeyless akeyless.io | 4% | 155 | 1,000 | 16 | 3,357 | $916 | 24 | 5 |
| Astrix Security astrix.security | 4% | 66 | 1,000 | 10 | 3,034 | 0 | 5 | |
| Oasis Security oasis.security | 4% | 62 | 2,400 | 53 | 4,117 | 11 | 3 | |
| One Identity oneidentity.com | 4% | 32 | 1,600 | 405 | 40,708 | 0 | 6 | |
| Saviynt saviynt.com Saviynt Identity Cloud 2% | 2% | 29 | 9,900 | 285 | 14,800 company | $71 | 34 | 1 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 18 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (akeyless.io, nhimg.org, oneidentity.com). The first result for “best non-human identity management platform” is saviynt.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best non-human identity management platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which machine identity and service account security tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade non-human identity management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best non-human identity management platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a non-human identity management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which non-human identity management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceno first choiceHeldOne IdentityBravura Identityno first choicenothing named
Seven alternatives
Akeyless, Astrix Security, CyberArk Conjur, HashiCorp Vault, JumpCloud, SPIFFE/SPIRE, VenafiNine alternatives
AppViewX, Astrix Security, Clutch Security, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, GitGuardian NHI Governance, HashiCorp Vault, Keyfactor, Oasis Security, SmallstepTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, One IdentityGPT-5.4 miniCyberArk Identity Security Platformagainst: KeyfactorCyberArk Identity Security PlatformHeldHashiCorp VaultAkeylessagainst: CyberArk Identity Security Platformno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Akeyless, VenafiOne alternative
HashiCorp VaultThree alternatives
CyberArk Identity Security Platform, HashiCorp Boundary, Keeper SecurityOne alternative
HashiCorp VaultGemini 3.5 FlashAkeylessOasis SecurityChangedOasis Security, Token SecuritySilverfortagainst: AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vaultno first choiceagainst: AWS Secrets Manager, Astrix Security, Azure Key Vault, Cisco, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Entro Security, HashiCorp Vault, Palo Alto Networks, SailPoint, Venafi
Six alternatives
Aembit, Cisco, Clutch Security, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, SailPoint, Token SecurityFour alternatives
Cisco, Entro Security, Palo Alto Networks Idira / NGTS, Token SecurityThree alternatives
Aembit, Astrix Security, Entro SecurityThree alternatives
Curity, Doppler, PermisoPerplexity SonarWorkOSCyberArk Identity Security PlatformChangedCyberArk Identity Security Platform, Microsoft, Saviynt Identity Cloudagainst: VeeamPing Identityagainst: Microsoft Entra IDno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Auth0, Descope, FronteggTwo alternatives
SailPoint, Sectigo Certificate ManagerSix alternatives
Akeyless, Astrix Security, GitGuardian NHI Governance, P0 Security, ServiceNow NHIM, TeleportOne alternative
SailPoint Identity Security CloudGrok 4.1 FastCyberArk Identity Security PlatformCyberArk Identity Security PlatformHeldno first choiceJumpCloudagainst: Aembit, Akeyless, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, HashiCorp Vault, SailPoint, Saviynt Identity CloudVenafiagainst: HashiCorp Vaultagainst: AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, ForgeRock, Google Secret Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Okta, Ping Identity, SailPoint, Saviynt Identity Cloud
Three alternatives
Aembit, Akeyless, VenafiSeven alternatives
Delinea, HashiCorp Boundary, HashiCorp Vault, Keyfactor, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint, VenafiTwo alternatives
Keyfactor, VenafiSeven alternatives
Akeyless, Astrix Security, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Entro Security, Oasis, Okta, Ping IdentityMistral SmallAstrix Security, One IdentityCyberArk's Machine Identity Security, NexoraChangedSaviynt Identity CloudLumos, SailPointno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Akeyless, SSOJetThree alternatives
CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Okta Identity Security Posture Management, VenafiOne alternative
Entro SecurityDeepSeek V4 FlashCyberArk Identity Security PlatformCyberArk Identity Security Platform, HashiCorp VaultChangedOasis SecurityCyberArk Identity Security Platformagainst: Akeyless, Astrix Security, HashiCorp Vault, JumpCloud, Oasis Security, SailPointno first choiceagainst: AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, CyberArk Conjur, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Google Secret Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Microsoft Entra ID, Oasis Security, Okta, Unosecur
Two alternatives
Astrix Security, VezaFour alternatives
Akeyless, CyberArk Conjur, Keyfactor, VenafiFive alternatives
Akeyless, Astrix Security, Clutch Security, CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Token SecurityOne alternative
AembitLlama 4 MaverickClutch SecuritySailPoint Machine Identity SecurityChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashHashiCorp Vault, VenafiVenafiChangedCyberArk Identity Security PlatformHashiCorp Vaultno first choiceagainst: AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, Veza
Three alternatives
AWS Secrets Manager, Akeyless, CyberArk ConjurTwo alternatives
CyberArk Conjur, HashiCorp VaultSix alternatives
Aembit, Delinea, HashiCorp Vault, SailPoint, Saviynt Identity Cloud, TeleportThree alternatives
AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, CyberArk Identity Security PlatformKimi K2CyberArk Identity Security PlatformCyberArk Identity Security PlatformHeldno first choiceagainst: OktaC1, Vezaagainst: AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, CyberArk Conjur, Google Secret Manager, HashiCorp VaultOasis, Tokenagainst: AWS IAM, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, GCP IAM, HashiCorp Vault, Microsoft Entra ID
Four alternatives
Astrix Security, Entro Security, Microsoft Entra Workload ID, VenafiFive alternatives
BeyondTrust, Delinea, HashiCorp Vault, Keyfactor, VenafiTwo alternatives
Akeyless, InfisicalTwo alternatives
Clutch, CyberArk Identity Security PlatformGLM 4.7 FlashXAembitSailPoint Machine Identity SecurityChangedOasis SecurityAembitno first choiceagainst: Delinea Secret Server
Two alternatives
HashiCorp Vault, VenafiTwo alternatives
Clutch Security, VenafiEight alternatives
Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Astrix Security, Entro Security, GitGuardian NHI Governance, JumpCloud, Okta Identity Security Posture Management, One Identity Suite, ServiceNow NHI SecurityTwo alternatives
GitGuardian NHI Governance, JumpCloudMiniMax M2.5Okta, SailPointCyberArk Conjur, HashiCorp VaultChangedCyberArk Identity Security PlatformSaviynt Identity Cloudagainst: CyberArk Identity Security Platform, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, SailPointno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Aembit, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, OasisOne alternative
VenafiFour alternatives
BeyondTrust, GitGuardian NHI Governance, HashiCorp Vault, KeyfactorOne alternative
VezaBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 21:41 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 21:41 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 21:41 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 21:30 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 21:32 | yes | 23 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 21:39 | yes | 11 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 21:39 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 21:35 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 21:38 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 21:42 | yes | 18 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 21:20 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 21:24 | yes | 12 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 21:30 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 21:40 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 21:22 | yes | 26 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 21:34 | yes | 24 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 21:31 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 21:39 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 21:32 | yes | 24 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 21:22 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 21:29 | yes | 14 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 21:25 | yes | 19 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 21:36 | yes | 22 | 59 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 21:33 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 21:29 | yes | 18 | 18 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 21:35 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 21:20 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 21:32 | yes | 21 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 21:28 | yes | 23 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 21:20 | yes | 25 | 17 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 21:26 | yes | 20 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 21:25 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 21:32 | yes | 18 | 45 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 21:30 | yes | 21 | 38 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 21:29 | yes | 19 | 31 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 21:40 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 21:34 | yes | 25 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 21:41 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 21:24 | yes | 26 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 21:41 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 21:23 | yes | 22 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 21:27 | yes | 11 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 21:38 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 21:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 21:41 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 21:25 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 21:26 | yes | 23 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 21:24 | yes | 21 | 52 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 21:42 | yes | 27 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 21:18 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 21:31 | yes | 11 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 21:19 | yes | 25 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 21:41 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 21:18 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 21:20 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 21:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 21:37 | yes | 15 | 66 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 21:18 | yes | 21 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 21:34 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 21:41 | no | 0 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 21:38 | yes | 36 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 21:26 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 21:18 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 21:22 | yes | 24 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 21:32 | yes | 22 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 21:41 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 21:18 | yes | 23 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 21:31 | yes | 10 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 21:26 | yes | 25 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 21:29 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 21:42 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 21:26 | yes | 20 | 44 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Astrix read as Astrix Security
CyberArk read as CyberArk Identity Security Platform
CyberArk (Conjur) read as CyberArk Identity Security Platform
CyberArk (Identity Security Platform) read as CyberArk Identity Security Platform
CyberArk (Palo Alto Networks) read as CyberArk Identity Security Platform
CyberArk (incl. Venafi) read as CyberArk Identity Security Platform
CyberArk (incorporating Venafi) read as CyberArk Identity Security Platform
CyberArk (with Venafi integration) read as CyberArk Identity Security Platform
CyberArk (with Venafi) read as CyberArk Identity Security Platform
Entro read as Entro Security
GitGuardian read as GitGuardian NHI Governance
GitGuardian Platform read as GitGuardian NHI Governance
HashiCorp read as HashiCorp Vault
HashiCorp (IBM) read as HashiCorp Vault
HashiCorp (Vault/Boundary) read as HashiCorp Vault
HashiCorp (now IBM) read as HashiCorp Vault
Microsoft Entra read as Microsoft Entra ID
Saviynt read as Saviynt Identity Cloud
Sectigo read as Sectigo Certificate Manager
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow NHIM
Unresolved, counted raw
8layers
AWS IAM Identity Center
Bravura Identity
CyberArk Machine Identity Security
CyberArk's Machine Identity Security
GCP IAM
IBM HashiCorp Vault
One Identity Suite (Active Roles & Safeguard)
Palo Alto Networks Idira / NGTS
SailPoint Agentic Fabric + Entro
SailPoint ISC
ServiceNow NHI Security
Unosecur
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.