| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-human identity management | Identity and access | 0% | 59 of 128 | 45% | 29 | criticized challenger | |
| Identity threat detection and response | Identity and access | 0% | 19 of 105 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Huntress Managed ITDR at 51% | |
| Identity governance | Identity and access | 0% | 25 of 76 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID Governance at 25% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“End-to-end identity security platform covering human, privileged, and machine identities ... Best For: Large enterprises needing comprehensive identity security across all identity types” Kimi K2 · NHI management · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for unified machine identity security and Zero Trust: CyberArk, especially post-Venafi for certificate and machine identity governance at enterprise scale.” Muse Glimmer 30B · NHI management · comparative prompt · first choice
“Consider larger, established platforms (e.g., CyberArk, now owned by Palo Alto Networks at $21-25B) that have deeper resources and more stable roadmaps” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NHI management · negative prompt · first choice
“CyberArk (including its Venafi acquisition) is the enterprise benchmark for managing large certificate estates and privileged access.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · NHI management · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid (for Mid-Market) - CyberArk, SailPoint, Saviynt (enterprise IGA suites)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NHI management · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid CyberArk/Venafi at this stage—they're overkill in both cost and complexity” Kimi K2 · NHI management · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“CyberArk/Traditional PAM: Overkill and overpriced for mid-market needs” Kimi K2 · NHI management · direct prompt · hard negative
“CyberArk | Enterprise pricing, way beyond SMB budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NHI management · budget prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 100 of the 107 answers that named CyberArk Identity Security Platform and are not a share of its labels.
345 of the 345 domain citations in answers naming CyberArk Identity Security Platform came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What CyberArk Identity Security Platform's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/identity-security, paloaltonetworks.com/idira/identity-security-guide, paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-identity-security, paloaltonetworks.com/idira/idira-identity-security-landscape, paloaltonetworks.com/idira/identity-security-landscape-report. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CyberArk Identity Security Platform's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CyberArk Identity Security Platform, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CyberArk Identity Security Platform by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: