| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-human identity management | Identity and access | 0% | 27 of 128 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by JumpCloud at 14% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“is a very credible alternative because it focuses on discovering, classifying, and governing service accounts, bots, RPAs, and other non-human identities” Perplexity Sonar · NHI management · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“(Best for Governance-focused) - Why: AI-driven discovery, governance, and automated lifecycle management” MiniMax M2.5 · NHI management · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If you prefer a more established IAM suite with strong governance, consider SailPoint or Opti.” Mistral Small · NHI management · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Alternative Recommendation: SailPoint Machine Identity Security” GLM 4.7 FlashX · NHI management · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named SailPoint Machine Identity Security and are not a share of its labels.
Thirty-eight of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming SailPoint Machine Identity Security came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What SailPoint Machine Identity Security's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: sailpoint.com/products/machine-identity-security, sailpoint.com/identity-library/machine-identities, sailpoint.com/identity-library/machine-identity-security, sailpoint.com/identity-library/protect-machine-identities, sailpoint.com/identity-library/machine-identity-security-program. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SailPoint Machine Identity Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SailPoint Machine Identity Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SailPoint Machine Identity Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: