| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-human identity management | Identity and access | 0% | 31 of 128 | 27% | 11 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Saviynt stands out with AI-powered recommendations and shadow AI detection.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · NHI management · comparative prompt · first choice
“Saviynt focuses on enterprise governance and automated entitlement management” Qwen 3.7 Flash · NHI management · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Enterprises wanting an all-in-one converged identity platform.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NHI management · comparative prompt · alternative
“a governance/lifecycle layer such as Saviynt or Oasis” Muse Glimmer 30B · NHI management · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid (for Mid-Market) - CyberArk, SailPoint, Saviynt (enterprise IGA suites)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NHI management · direct prompt · hard negative
“Has a steep learning curve with UI friction and more complex setup” Claude Haiku 4.5 · NHI management · negative prompt · soft negative
“may be less purpose-built for the NHI challenge” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NHI management · scale prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 29 answers that named Saviynt Identity Cloud and are not a share of its labels.
135 of the 135 domain citations in answers naming Saviynt Identity Cloud came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Saviynt Identity Cloud's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: exchange.saviynt.com/products/iam-digital, exchange.saviynt.com/products/iga-migrations, exchange.saviynt.com/products/saviynt-for-wiz, exchange.saviynt.com/products/digital-identity, exchange.saviynt.com/products/saviynt-terraform-provider. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Saviynt Identity Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Saviynt Identity Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Saviynt Identity Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: