| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secrets management | Identity and access | 31% | 1 of 59 | 34% | 77 | criticized default | ▲+3Since September 2026: 30% → 33%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Non-human identity management | Identity and access | 7% | 5 of 128 | 30% | 40 | criticized challenger | |
| Privileged access management | Identity and access | 2% | 9 of 73 | 18% | 22 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Certificate lifecycle management | Identity and access | 0% | 57 of 104 | 33% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Sectigo Certificate Manager at 27% | |
| Container and Kubernetes security | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 57 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Trivy at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHI management | 0% | 8% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 8% now. | New this edition | Rank 5 of 128, unchanged |
| Secrets | 30% | 33% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 30% → 33%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 1 of 59 |
| PAM | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 9 of 73 |
| Certificate management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 57 of 104, unchanged |
| Container security | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 45 → 57 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 13 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| Grok 4.20 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| Mistral Small | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 10 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 11 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 6 | 1 | 9 | 18 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 13 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 14 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“HashiCorp Vault (open-source Community Edition) stands out as the best non-human identity management (NHIAM) platform for a company with a limited budget.” Grok 4.20 · NHI management · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Delinea if you need a balanced, mid-market-focused PAM solution, or HashiCorp Vault if you have strong DevOps capabilities” Kimi K2 · Secrets · direct prompt · first choice
“HashiCorp Vault remains the most capable and widely deployed, making it ideal if you have multi-cloud environments and complex requirements.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Secrets · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies with a mix of cloud and on-premises needs, HashiCorp Vault is the most flexible and scalable choice” Mistral Small · Secrets · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“The main platforms to avoid or scrutinize closely are: - Secrets-only tools such as HashiCorp Vault when you need full PAM” Perplexity Sonar · PAM · negative prompt · hard negative
“for a mid-sized B2B company, it is generally no longer recommended unless you have a dedicated platform team” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secrets · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Development-Centric Secret Managers (e.g., HashiCorp Vault) Status: *Avoid Using It as a Primary CA*” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Certificate management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Pure secrets managers (HashiCorp Vault alone): Don't solve the full NHI governance problem” Kimi K2 · NHI management · direct prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 357 of the 403 answers that named HashiCorp Vault and are not a share of its labels.
1,074 of the 1,074 domain citations in answers naming HashiCorp Vault came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,988 | undated | IaC, Secrets | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 675 | undated | Secrets, PAM | ||
| Template or tool | 224 | 0 | 2026-06-19 | APM, Secrets | |
| Conference or event | 203 | undated | |||
| Case study | 44 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 35 | 0 | 2026-04-15 | IaC | |
| Comparison | 22 | 1 | 2026-07-14 | ||
| Report or ebook | 19 | 0 | 2026-03-05 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on hashicorp.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page hashicorp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What HashiCorp Vault's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: hashicorp.com, hashicorp.com/en/pricing, hashicorp.com/en/trust, hashicorp.com/en/products/vault, hashicorp.com/en/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HashiCorp Vault's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HashiCorp Vault, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HashiCorp Vault by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend HashiCorp Vault first in Secrets management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.