Every category where a model named SailPoint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Identity governance	Identity and access	3%	12 of 77	67%	42	criticized challenger
Workforce identity and SSO	Identity and access	0%	11 of 48	10%	10	accepted challenger
Customer identity and access management	Identity and access	0%	61 of 74	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Auth0 at 22%
Privileged access management	Identity and access	0%	68 of 74	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine PAM360 at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SailPoint yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SailPoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	2	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2	4
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	3	5
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	2	4	7
Mistral Small	1	0	2	1	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	3	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	3	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	7	9
Kimi K2	1	0	0	4	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	2	2	5
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	2	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct27 labels6

Paraphrase18 labels6

Comparative31 labels11not counted in share

Budget-constrained24 labels1

Scale-constrained21 labels2

Negative32 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative153 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 27 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“#1 by revenue; trusted by 53 % of the Fortune 500... Maximum depth, broadest connector set, and proven compliance rigor | SailPoint” GLM 4.7 FlashX · IGA · comparative prompt · first choice

“Market position: #1 by revenue; used by 53% of the Fortune 500 ... Most mature and complete feature set for complex enterprises” Kimi K2 · IGA · comparative prompt · first choice

“Top Recommendation: SailPoint is frequently cited as a leader in the Identity Governance and Administration (IGA) space” MiniMax M2.5 · IGA · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Often considered the gold standard in the industry, SailPoint holds a leading position in Gartner’s Magic Quadrant.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · IGA · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“If you are under 500 employees, avoid enterprise giants like SailPoint; the administrative overhead will crush your team.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · IGA · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“points toward cloud-native, automated solutions rather than legacy, consultancy-heavy platforms (like SailPoint)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · IGA · direct prompt · hard negative

“Avoid legacy enterprise tools (SailPoint, Oracle) as they require heavy implementation costs and dedicated admins” MiniMax M2.5 · IGA · budget prompt · hard negative

“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Legacy enterprise platforms (SailPoint, Saviynt)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · IGA · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SailPoint, over the 153 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SailPoint was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud91 of 1532Not in the top three

Okta Identity Governance67 of 1534Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra ID Governance65 of 15314Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra ID48 of 15316Not in the top three

Lumos45 of 15314Not in the top three

One Identity Manager44 of 1531Not in the top three

Ping Identity38 of 1531Not in the top three

JumpCloud35 of 15312Not in the top three

Okta33 of 1534Not in the top three

AccessOwl32 of 15320Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SailPoint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 121 of the 153 answers that named SailPoint and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com58

idenhq.com56

corma.io50

startwithidentity.com50

expertinsights.com47

lumos.com46

aimultiple.com43

zluri.com39

solutionsreview.com38

oneidentity.com36

463 of the 463 domain citations in answers naming SailPoint came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/identity-governance-administration57

aimultiple.com/iga-solutions43

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-identity-governance-and-administrati37

corma.io/blog/best-iga-solutions-for-mid-market-companies36

accessowl.com/blog/buyers-guide-for-iga-tools-by-team-size35

solutionsreview.com/identity-management/the-best-identity-governance-tools-and-vendors-235

oneidentity.com/learn/top-5-identity-governance-and-administration-tools-in-2025.aspx33

idenhq.com/en/blog/identity-governance-and-administration-complete27

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SailPoint

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SailPoint; a claim can dispute any of them.

SailPoint (Identity Security Cloud & IdentityIQ) 1SailPoint (IdentityIQ/IdentityNow) 1SailPoint (IdentityNow / IdentityIQ) 1SailPoint/Saviynt 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SailPoint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SailPoint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sailpoint.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.