| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-human identity management | Identity and access | 5% | 7 of 128 | 6% | 16 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Aembit stands out as the best pure-play non-human identity management platform” Mistral Small · NHI management · direct prompt · first choice
“Aembit is my pick for low-cost managed workload access” GPT-6 Luna · NHI management · budget prompt · first choice
“Secretless workload-to-workload access—replacing static credentials rather than just cataloging them | Aembit” GPT-6 Luna · NHI management · direct prompt · alternative
“Aembit is highlighted for "Engineering-led teams solving workload-to-workload and agent-to-API access."” Muse Glimmer 30B · NHI management · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Newer, smaller market share” GLM 4.7 FlashX · NHI management · comparative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 51 answers that named Aembit and are not a share of its labels.
173 of the 198 domain citations in answers naming Aembit came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 271 | 17 | 2026-10-02 | Secrets, IaC | |
| Glossary or explainer | 199 | 3 | 2026-09-30 | IGA, MFA | |
| Comparison | 104 | 4 | 2026-09-29 | IGA, Secrets | |
| News or press | 27 | 0 | 2024-04-03 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 16 | 0 | 2025-03-07 | Secrets | |
| Case study | 5 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 3 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2024-04-23 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-04-07 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Every page aembit.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Aembit's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: aembit.io, aembit.io/pricing, trust.aembit.io, aembit.io/use-cases, aembit.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aembit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aembit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Aembit by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: