AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Aembit · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Aembit

51Judge labels
11First choices
2Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in NHI management for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 128 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Aembit →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In nhi management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Aembit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Non-human identity managementIdentity and access5%7 of 1286%16accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Aembit yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Aembit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01203
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna13004
Muse Glimmer 30B02103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct18 labels6
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative15 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labels5
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative4 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative51 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 18 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Aembit stands out as the best pure-play non-human identity management platform” Mistral Small · NHI management · direct prompt · first choice
“Aembit is my pick for low-cost managed workload access” GPT-6 Luna · NHI management · budget prompt · first choice
“Secretless workload-to-workload access—replacing static credentials rather than just cataloging them | Aembit” GPT-6 Luna · NHI management · direct prompt · alternative
“Aembit is highlighted for "Engineering-led teams solving workload-to-workload and agent-to-API access."” Muse Glimmer 30B · NHI management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Newer, smaller market share” GLM 4.7 FlashX · NHI management · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Aembit, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Aembit was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Astrix Security25 of 513Not among the top eight
Oasis Security21 of 511Not among the top eight
CyberArk Identity Security Platform17 of 515Not among the top eight
Venafi15 of 510Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Aembit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 51 answers that named Aembit and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com31
startupstash.com26
aembit.ioYour site25
oneidentity.com20
startwithidentity.com19
securityboulevard.com17
wwt.com17
cybersecmanager.net15
akeyless.io14
majorkeytech.com14

173 of the 198 domain citations in answers naming Aembit came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

aembit.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Aembit takes 5% of first choices and JumpCloud takes 14%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “non-human identity management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best non-human identity management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
590 a month (“aembit”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
4 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 3,239 a month
Searches its site ranks for
969 · 53 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,101
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
16 ads · 15 text, 1 image · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2025, as Aembit, Inc., verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
5%
rank 7 of 128 in NHI management
Segment leader
14%
JumpCloud
First choices
11 across its categories
Named in
51 answers
Its own site cited
in 50 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on aembit.io
762
subdomains included
Content
630
counted in the table below
Documentation
8
Product · Integration
16 · 2
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog271172026-10-02Secrets, IaC
Glossary or explainer19932026-09-30IGA, MFA
Comparison10442026-09-29IGA, Secrets
News or press2702024-04-03
Webinar or virtual event1602025-03-07Secrets
Case study5undated
Report or ebook3undated
Conference or event202024-04-23
Template or tool202026-04-07
Podcast or video1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page aembit.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Aembit

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Aembit is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
IAM for agentic AI and workloads
For
security, identity, platform engineering, DevOps, and application teams
Price stated
free- forever tier aembit.io
Starting price
Free! aembit.io/pricing
Free plan or trial
free- forever tier aembit.io
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO 27001:2022ISO/IEC 27001SOC 2ANAB (ANSI National Accreditation Board)
Customers named
SnowflakeRed Cup ITLarge RetailerGlobal Property Management FirmA $300B Investment FirmStripeSalesforcea large retailer
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting

What Aembit's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: aembit.io, aembit.io/pricing, trust.aembit.io, aembit.io/use-cases, aembit.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aembit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aembit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Aembit by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Aembit is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Aembit, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aembit.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.