Every category where a model named Veracode Risk Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Application security posture management	Developer platform	0%	22 of 70	22%	9	under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Veracode Risk Manager yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Veracode Risk Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase11 labelsNone

Comparative4 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“start with ArmorCode and Veracode Risk Manager” GPT-6 Luna · ASPM · comparative prompt · first choice

“Checkmarx or Veracode: If you are looking for a more traditional, enterprise-grade solution” MiniMax M2.5 · ASPM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“The Best for Compliance-Heavy Industries: Veracode (Hyland)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ASPM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Good for earlier-stage AppSec programs” MiniMax M2.5 · ASPM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“It's not overly enterprise-heavy like Checkmarx or Veracode” Grok 4.1 Fast · ASPM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“Veracode acquiring Longbow Security” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Veracode Risk Manager, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Veracode Risk Manager was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Checkmarx One27 of 354Not among the top eight

Snyk19 of 356Not among the top eight

Cycode ASPM17 of 350Not among the top eight

Aikido Security12 of 358Not among the top eight

Apiiro12 of 355Not among the top eight

ArmorCode12 of 350Not among the top eight

OX Security11 of 350Not among the top eight

Wiz10 of 351Not among the top eight

Legit Security9 of 350Not among the top eight

Jit8 of 350Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Veracode Risk Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 35 answers that named Veracode Risk Manager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

checkmarx.com24

expertinsights.com19

startupstash.com19

cycode.com17

ox.security16

gartner.com14

appsecsanta.com13

guideflow.com13

geeksframework.com12

orca.security12

159 of the 159 domain citations in answers naming Veracode Risk Manager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

startupstash.com/top-tools-application-security-posture-management19

expertinsights.com/application-security/the-top-application-security-posture-management-as17

ox.security/blog/aspm-tools14

checkmarx.com/learn/aspm/best-aspm-tools-5-platforms-to-watch-in-202613

gartner.com/reviews/market/application-security-posture-management-aspm-tools13

geeksframework.com/software/application-security-posture-management-aspm12

guideflow.com/blog/aspm-software12

orca.security/resources/blog/best-aspm-tools12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

veracode.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Veracode Risk Manager takes 0% of first choices and Aikido Security takes 37%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “aspm platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “aspm platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“veracode risk manager”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its company's site: veracode.com shared with Veracode's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site: about 12,543 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,691 · 181 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 9,588
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

22 ads · 17 image, 3 text, 2 video · 17 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2026, as Veracode, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 22 in the year. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 22 of 70 in ASPM

Segment leader

37%

Aikido Security

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 35 answers
Its own site cited: in 32 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Veracode Risk Manager

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Veracode Risk Manager; a claim can dispute any of them.

Veracode 6Veracode (Hyland) 1

Follow Veracode Risk Manager

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Veracode is the company behind Veracode Risk Manager.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Veracode: Veracode DAST, Veracode Developer Training, Veracode Dynamic Analysis, Veracode Secure Code Training, Veracode Security Labs, Veracode Training

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Our ASPM solution
veracode.com/risk-manager
Integrations claimed: 50 veracode.com/risk-manager
Customers named: Manhattan AssociatesHDI Global SECox Automotive
Not stated on the pages read: Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting

What Veracode Risk Manager's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: veracode.com/risk-manager, veracode.com/veracode-risk-manager-latam, veracode.com/veracode-risk-manager-brazil, veracode.com/manage-web-app-attack-surface-risk, docs.veracode.com/r/VRM_APIs. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Veracode Risk Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Veracode Risk Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Veracode Risk Manager by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Veracode Risk Manager is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Veracode Risk Manager, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.