Every category where a model named ArmorCode for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Application security posture management	Developer platform	4%	6 of 70	24%	33	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ArmorCode yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ArmorCode across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	1	2	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	2	3
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	1	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	3	0	0	0	3
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct21 labels4

Paraphrase10 labels5

Comparative30 labels6not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labels2

Scale-constrained9 labels1

Negative19 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative101 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Wiz or ArmorCode if you are a cloud-native organization looking for a "single pane of glass"” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ASPM · comparative prompt · first choice

“Many existing scanners; don’t want to replace them: start with ArmorCode and Veracode Risk Manager.” GPT-6 Luna · ASPM · comparative prompt · first choice

“Choose ArmorCode if you have 30+ security tools ... it's the ultimate unification and automation engine.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASPM · comparative prompt · first choice

“My default recommendation would be ArmorCode for a mid-sized B2B company” GPT-6 Luna · ASPM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Enterprise-grade ASPM platforms (such as ArmorCode, Cycode, and Apiiro) are incredibly powerful, but their pricing models are built for large enterprises and often start at tens of thousands of dollars” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ASPM · budget prompt · soft negative

“Some aggregator-focused platforms like ArmorCode, Tromzo, and similar tools that primarily focus on ingesting and reporting rather than adding intelligence.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative

“ArmorCode is positioned as a vendor-neutral AppSec command centre that integrates with 100-plus security tools, deduplicates findings and is an aggregator only.” Muse Glimmer 30B · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative

“Overhyped or immature platforms at enterprise scale: Examples from critiques: ArmorCode, Apiiro, OX Security” Grok 4.1 Fast · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ArmorCode, over the 101 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ArmorCode was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cycode ASPM69 of 1014Compare →

Apiiro62 of 10110Not among the top eight

Aikido Security42 of 10126Compare →

OX Security40 of 1011Not among the top eight

Checkmarx One38 of 1015Not among the top eight

Snyk35 of 1013Compare →

Legit Security29 of 1010Not among the top eight

Snyk AppRisk28 of 1011Not among the top eight

Jit27 of 1013Compare →

DefectDojo26 of 1014Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ArmorCode. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 101 of the 101 answers that named ArmorCode and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

checkmarx.com61

cycode.com59

ox.security52

expertinsights.com49

appsecsanta.com48

gartner.com48

orca.security46

guideflow.com38

invicti.com35

stackhawk.com31

467 of the 467 domain citations in answers naming ArmorCode came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ox.security/blog/aspm-tools48

gartner.com/reviews/market/application-security-posture-management-aspm-tools44

orca.security/resources/blog/best-aspm-tools44

cycode.com/blog/best-application-secuirty-posture-management-tools43

checkmarx.com/learn/aspm/best-aspm-tools-5-platforms-to-watch-in-202642

expertinsights.com/application-security/the-top-application-security-posture-management-as41

guideflow.com/blog/aspm-software37

stackhawk.com/blog/best-aspm-tools31

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

armorcode.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ArmorCode takes 4% of first choices and Aikido Security takes 37%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “aspm platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “aspm platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,300 a month (“armorcode”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 15 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 11,106 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 672 · 48 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,203
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

52 ads · 30 image, 20 text, 2 video · 9 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2024, as ArmorCode, Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 15 in the year, 37 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 6 of 70 in ASPM

Segment leader

37%

Aikido Security

First choices: 12 across its categories
Named in: 101 answers
Its own site cited: in 101 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on armorcode.com

474

subdomains included

Content

411

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

1 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	192	6	2026-09-15	ASPM, CSPM
Podcast or video	126	0	2025-01-29	ASPM, SAST
News or press	22	2	2026-08-04	ASPM
Report or ebook	18	1	2026-08-18	ASPM, UEM
Glossary or explainer	18	4	2026-09-02	ASPM
Comparison	16	5	2026-09-24	ASPM, SOAR
Case study	7	0	2025-09-10
Webinar or virtual event	6	3	2026-09-16	ASPM
Conference or event	6	0	2025-05-05

Most recent

2026-09-24Servicenow vr alternative comparison
2026-09-16From vulnerabilities to compliance getting ready for cra enforcement webinar or virtual event
2026-09-15Manufacturing cybersecurity industrial security blog
2026-09-15Retail cybersecurity ecommerce security blog
2026-09-15Software security solutions for technology cybersecurity blog
2026-09-02What is attack path analysis a practitioners guide glossary or explainer

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page armorcode.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow ArmorCode

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ArmorCode is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The independent Agentic Control Plane where AI agents help security teams correlate, triage, and remediate vulnerabilities across infrastructure, cloud, supply chain, apps, and AI.
armorcode.com
For: security teams
armorcode.com
Integrations claimed: 400 armorcode.com · 375 armorcode.com/platform pages disagree
Certifications: SOC 2 Type 2 ComplianceSOC2 Type 2 compliance and attestation
Customers named: Snap FinanceVTSS&P GlobalShutterflyThe Motley FoolAthenahealthJohnson ControlsSpecialty Auto Insurance
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What ArmorCode's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: armorcode.com, armorcode.com/security, armorcode.com/platform, armorcode.com/customers, armorcode.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ArmorCode's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ArmorCode, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ArmorCode by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where ArmorCode is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name ArmorCode, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.