| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application security posture management | Developer platform | 0% | 16 of 70 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Legit Security is an AI-native ASPM designed around the philosophy that you cannot secure applications without securing the "software factory"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ASPM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Top Pick: Legit Security ... Excellent for proving your SDLC security posture to enterprise buyers.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ASPM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best if you want a more polished, AI-forward posture platform: Legit Security” GPT-5.4 mini · ASPM · direct prompt · alternative
“Choose Legit Security if you're in a highly regulated industry” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASPM · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 40 answers that named Legit Security and are not a share of its labels.
179 of the 192 domain citations in answers naming Legit Security came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 223 | 5 | 2026-10-01 | ASPM, CNAPP | |
| News or press | 40 | 1 | 2026-08-03 | ASPM, SAST | |
| Glossary or explainer | 38 | 0 | 2026-01-05 | SAST, Secrets | |
| Comparison | 11 | 0 | 2026-01-05 | SASE, SAST | |
| Case study | 8 | 0 | 2023-09-27 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2025-02-06 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Every page legitsecurity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Legit Security's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: legitsecurity.com, trust.legitsecurity.com, legitsecurity.com/platform/aspm, legitsecurity.com/customers, legitsecurity.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Legit Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Legit Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Legit Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: