AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Legit Security · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Legit Security

40Judge labels
1First choices
10Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in ASPM for enterprise buyers
Rank 16 of 70 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Legit Security →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In aspm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Legit Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Application security posture managementDeveloper platform0%16 of 700%12accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Legit Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Legit Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01102
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00202
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels1
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative14 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Legit Security is an AI-native ASPM designed around the philosophy that you cannot secure applications without securing the "software factory"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ASPM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Top Pick: Legit Security ... Excellent for proving your SDLC security posture to enterprise buyers.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ASPM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best if you want a more polished, AI-forward posture platform: Legit Security” GPT-5.4 mini · ASPM · direct prompt · alternative
“Choose Legit Security if you're in a highly regulated industry” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASPM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Legit Security, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Legit Security was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ArmorCode29 of 406Not among the top eight
Cycode ASPM29 of 401Not among the top eight
Apiiro23 of 407Not among the top eight
Aikido Security21 of 4015Not among the top eight
Checkmarx One16 of 403Not among the top eight
OX Security13 of 401Not among the top eight
DefectDojo11 of 401Not among the top eight
Snyk11 of 401Not among the top eight
Jit10 of 400Not among the top eight
Snyk AppRisk10 of 400Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Legit Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 40 answers that named Legit Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

checkmarx.com29
cycode.com24
expertinsights.com24
ox.security21
appsecsanta.com20
gartner.com20
orca.security16
guideflow.com13
legitsecurity.comYour site13
plexicus.ai12

179 of the 192 domain citations in answers naming Legit Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

legitsecurity.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Legit Security takes 0% of first choices and Aikido Security takes 37%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “aspm platform”
7
Position for “aspm platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
480 a month (“legit security”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2,624 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 9,602 a month
Searches its site ranks for
4,943 · 95 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,457
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
12 ads · 12 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2023, as Legit Security Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 4 in the year, 8 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 70 in ASPM
Segment leader
37%
Aikido Security
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
40 answers
Its own site cited
in 39 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on legitsecurity.com
547
subdomains included
Content
325
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
2 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog22352026-10-01ASPM, CNAPP
News or press4012026-08-03ASPM, SAST
Glossary or explainer3802026-01-05SAST, Secrets
Comparison1102026-01-05SASE, SAST
Case study802023-09-27
Template or tool302025-02-06
Webinar or virtual event1undated
Report or ebook1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page legitsecurity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Legit Security

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Legit Security is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-native ASPM platform to detect, fix and prevent AppSec risk from AI-generated code, secrets, and critical vulnerabilities.
For
security teams
Price stated
Plans & Packages legitsecurity.com/platform/aspm
Integrations claimed
120 legitsecurity.com/integrations
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001:2022
Hosting
US
Customers named
Kraft-HeinzACV AuctionsNetskopeChicago Board of Options Exchange (CBOE)Noname SecurityFirebolt AnalyticsCybersecurity vendor
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial

What Legit Security's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: legitsecurity.com, trust.legitsecurity.com, legitsecurity.com/platform/aspm, legitsecurity.com/customers, legitsecurity.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Legit Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Legit Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Legit Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Legit Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Legit Security, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at legitsecurity.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.