IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › OX Security · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

OX Security

17Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. OX Security was named 8 times in SCA and 2 other categories, where Trivy led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market26 of 49

under the label threshold

Enterprise34 of 49

under the label threshold

In sca · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named OX Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Software composition analysis	Developer platform	0%	26 of 49	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Trivy at 40%
Static application security testing	Developer platform	0%	23 of 47	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Semgrep at 47%
Container and Kubernetes security	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	31 of 78	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Aqua Security at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OX Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OX Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	2
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	3	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for security teams that need SCA findings correlated with pipeline context, runtime data, and business impact.” Mistral Small · SCA · direct prompt · alternative

“Best contextual prioritization: OX Security” Perplexity Sonar · Container security · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OX Security, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OX Security was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Aqua Security9 of 174Not in the top three

Aikido Security7 of 170Not in the top three

Prisma Cloud7 of 170Not in the top three

Sysdig Secure6 of 172Not in the top three

Wiz6 of 171Not in the top three

Falco4 of 171Not in the top three

Mend.io4 of 171Not in the top three

Sonatype Lifecycle4 of 171Not in the top three

Trivy4 of 171Not in the top three

Black Duck4 of 170Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OX Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named OX Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ox.security17

gbhackers.com8

checkmarx.com7

expertinsights.com7

safeguard.sh6

cyberpress.org5

endorlabs.com5

minimus.io5

cybersecuritynews.com4

decryptiondigest.com4

Sixty-eight of the sixty-eight domain citations in answers naming OX Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gbhackers.com/best-container-security-compared8

ox.security/blog/container-security-solutions-in-20266

cyberpress.org/container-security-by-business-size-25

ox.security/blog/container-security-tools-20265

decryptiondigest.com/blog/guide-finding-best-container-security-tools4

endorlabs.com/learn/best-sca-tools-05b7a4

expertinsights.com/application-security/the-top-container-security-tools4

ox.security/blog/software-composition-analysis-and-sca-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OX Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OX Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oxsecurity.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.