3 categories · RankedOX Security
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application security posture management | Developer platform | 0% | 18 of 70 | 21% | 19 | accepted challenger | |
| Container and Kubernetes security | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 44 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Trivy at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Static application security testing | Developer platform | 0% | 45 of 71 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Semgrep at 36% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
By model
How each model treated OX Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“OX Security differentiates itself by shifting ASPM from a *passive* reporting tool to an active enforcement platform.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ASPM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Teams overwhelmed by thousands of generic CVE alerts who want actionable, high-priority tickets.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Container security · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Risk-averse teams needing precise, context-aware vulnerability ranking.” Grok 4.20 · ASPM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Markets an "active ASPM" approach that combines native scanning across the SDLC” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ASPM · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“ASPM platforms like Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode, OX Security, AccuKnox, and Snyk AppRisk aggregate security findings into a unified posture view; they cannot test a compiled mobile binary” Muse Glimmer 30B · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Overhyped or immature platforms at enterprise scale: Examples from critiques: ArmorCode, Apiiro, OX Security” Grok 4.20 · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Users cite integration issues, limited documentation, and insufficient support for various tools.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative
“called out as having a significant blind spot” Kimi K2 · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OX Security, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OX Security was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 58 of the 58 answers that named OX Security and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
241 of the 287 domain citations in answers naming OX Security came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
ox.security is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, OX Security takes 0% of first choices and Aikido Security takes 37%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“ox security”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 72 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 5,625 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,921 · 88 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,556
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 33 clicks and $447 a month (estimate)
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 58 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 58 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 418 | 11 | 2026-09-28 | SCA, SAST | |
| Report or ebook | 72 | 1 | 2026-09-24 | SCA | |
| Conference or event | 60 | 5 | 2026-10-13 | ||
| Podcast or video | 38 | 0 | 2025-09-09 | ||
| News or press | 33 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 30 | 1 | 2026-07-10 | SAST, SCA | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 27 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 25 | 3 | 2026-08-19 | SCA, CNAPP | |
| Case study | 9 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2026-04-06 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-13How ai is changing the threats and expectations of cloud security tools conference or event
- 2026-09-28Phantomsub malicious npm campaign secretly adds users to whatsapp spam channels blog
- 2026-09-24How mcp is bypassing a decade of cloud security best practices blog
- 2026-09-2415465 mcp servers 0 governance report or ebook
- 2026-09-22How ai is changing the threats and expectations of cloud security tools webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-16Ox security launches ox cloud ai agent security blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page ox.security exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SCA (13); 8 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as OX Security
Follow OX Security
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
OX Security is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Active Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
- For
- application security expert
- Price stated
- Pricing is based on the number of active developers. ox.security/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free ox.security
- Integrations claimed
- 150 ox.security/pricing
- Certifications
- Sales & technical certification program
- Customers named
- SwisscomDoubleVerifyUpstream SecurityAuditBoardKalturaeBlu Solutions
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, hosting
What OX Security's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: ox.security, ox.security/pricing, ox.security/product, ox.security/customer-stories, ox.security/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OX Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OX Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OX Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where OX Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name OX Security, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.