Every category where a model named Jit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Application security posture management	Developer platform	6%	5 of 70	6%	18	accepted challenger
API security platforms	Security operations	0%	67 of 93	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 12%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Jit yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Jit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.20	0	2	2	0	4
Mistral Small	1	0	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	2	0	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct18 labels1

Paraphrase16 labels3

Comparative17 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative67 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid-sized B2B companies: Start with Jit for its ease of use, built-in scanning, and developer-friendly approach.” Mistral Small · ASPM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Jit is a cloud-native, developer-first Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) and DevSecOps orchestration platform.” Muse Glimmer 30B · ASPM · comparative prompt · first choice

“Jit is considered the best overall ASPM tool in 2026” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ASPM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Jit - best all-round fit for mid-market unification” Muse Glimmer 30B · ASPM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Users report integration issues—doesn't support all enterprise environments, requires extra manual setup. Also lacking customer support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Jit, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jit was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Aikido Security40 of 6730Compare →

ArmorCode27 of 672Compare →

Cycode ASPM26 of 672Compare →

Snyk25 of 677Compare →

Apiiro23 of 674Not among the top eight

Checkmarx One17 of 675Not among the top eight

DefectDojo16 of 671Compare →

OX Security14 of 670Not among the top eight

Snyk AppRisk11 of 670Not among the top eight

Wiz11 of 670Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 67 of the 67 answers that named Jit and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com43

gartner.com41

checkmarx.com37

cycode.com35

jit.ioYour site33

appsecsanta.com32

startupstash.com32

g2.com31

orca.security27

guideflow.com26

304 of the 337 domain citations in answers naming Jit came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/application-security-posture-management-aspm-tools41

expertinsights.com/application-security/the-top-application-security-posture-management-as33

startupstash.com/top-tools-application-security-posture-management31

checkmarx.com/learn/aspm/best-aspm-tools-5-platforms-to-watch-in-202629

jit.io/resources/app-security/top-aspm-tools28

cycode.com/blog/best-application-secuirty-posture-management-tools27

orca.security/resources/blog/best-aspm-tools27

guideflow.com/blog/aspm-software26

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

jit.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Jit takes 6% of first choices and Aikido Security takes 37%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “aspm platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “aspm platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 33,100 a month (“jit”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 6,450 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 5,093 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,863 · 78 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,050
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 5 of 70 in ASPM

Segment leader

37%

Aikido Security

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 67 answers
Its own site cited: in 67 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Jit

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Jit; a claim can dispute any of them.

Jit (by Torq) 1OX Security / Jit 1

Follow Jit

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Jit by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Jit is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Jit, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.