Every category where a model named Snyk for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Static application security testing	Developer platform	7%	4 of 47	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by Semgrep at 47%
Container and Kubernetes security	Cloud and infrastructure	2%	9 of 78	17%	23	accepted challenger
Cloud security posture management	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	52 of 53	67%	6	under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 43%
Vulnerability management platforms	Security operations	0%	22 of 80	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 45%
Cloud-native application protection	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	48 of 57	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 46%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Snyk yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Snyk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	4	0	5
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	1	2	6
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	0	3	6
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	3	2	0	6
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	3	1	2	0	6
Kimi K2	0	1	2	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct26 labels5

Paraphrase13 labels3

Comparative28 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained34 labels4

Scale-constrained23 labels4

Negative27 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative151 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 20 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Snyk if you want the best developer experience, low friction, and a unified view of open-source risks (SCA) mixed with custom code risks.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SAST · direct prompt · first choice

“Semgrep Code or Snyk Code. They are incredibly fast, have great PR integration, and are built around developer workflows.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SAST · scale prompt · first choice

“For Developers: Look for speed and integration into Git/Helm/CI pipelines (e.g., Snyk, Checkov)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Container security · negative prompt · first choice

“best if you're developer-led / engineer-heavy... If your pain is developers not fixing vulns → Snyk” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Container security · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Snyk if you have strict rate limits on Docker Hub or are sensitive to high false-positive rates.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Container security · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid if you need enterprise-scale cloud config scanning over app-sec focus.” Grok 4.1 Fast · CSPM · negative prompt · hard negative

“third-party platforms like Snyk or Cloudaware may be worth the investment. However, for most small businesses, starting with native tools and open-source solutions is the most cost-effective” Mistral Small · CSPM · budget prompt · soft negative

“Snyk does not offer deep runtime security monitoring, active threat blockages, or cluster posture management.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Container security · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Snyk, over the 151 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Snyk was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Prisma Cloud78 of 1513Not in the top three

Aqua Security75 of 15118Not in the top three

Wiz73 of 15115Not in the top three

Trivy52 of 15123Not in the top three

Falco49 of 15111Not in the top three

Sysdig47 of 1513Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender for Cloud37 of 1518Not in the top three

Sysdig Secure31 of 1515Not in the top three

Kubescape30 of 1517Not in the top three

SUSE NeuVector28 of 1511Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Snyk. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 107 of the 151 answers that named Snyk and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org72

gbhackers.com64

cybersecuritynews.com61

expertinsights.com48

ox.security39

decryptiondigest.com34

checkmarx.com29

g2.com25

softwareadvice.com24

orca.security22

418 of the 418 domain citations in answers naming Snyk came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cyberpress.org/container-security-by-business-size-256

gbhackers.com/best-container-security-compared55

cybersecuritynews.com/best-container-security-tools35

decryptiondigest.com/blog/guide-finding-best-container-security-tools29

expertinsights.com/application-security/the-top-container-security-tools29

ox.security/blog/container-security-solutions-in-202624

softwareadvice.com/container-security24

ox.security/blog/container-security-tools-202621

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Snyk

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Snyk; a claim can dispute any of them.

Snyk (Snyk Code) 2Snyk (Container Security) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Snyk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Snyk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at snyk.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.