| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application security posture management | Developer platform | 0% | 17 of 70 | 32% | 25 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Recognized as a leader in Gartner's Magic Quadrant, Apiiro is praised for its advanced risk prioritization and code-to-cloud context.” Mistral Small · ASPM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Apiiro is widely regarded as an industry leader in risk-based orchestration.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ASPM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Gartner-ranked #1 in ASPM (2025); deep code-to-runtime platform” Kimi K2 · ASPM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Gartner ASPM Magic Quadrant Leader (highest ratings).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASPM · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid - Apiiro: Strong platform but enterprise-focused pricing (starts ~$250K/year)” Kimi K2 · ASPM · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Traditional enterprise ASPM platforms (Checkmarx, Fortify, Apiiro)” Kimi K2 · ASPM · budget prompt · hard negative
“ASPM platforms like Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode, OX Security, AccuKnox, and Snyk AppRisk aggregate security findings into a unified posture view; they cannot test a compiled mobile binary” Muse Glimmer 30B · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tools like Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode, OX Security, AccuKnox, and Snyk AppRisk were specifically called out as having a significant blind spot” Kimi K2 · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 75 of the 75 answers that named Apiiro and are not a share of its labels.
393 of the 393 domain citations in answers naming Apiiro came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 229 | undated | SAST, CSPM | ||
| Blog | 194 | undated | ASPM, SAST | ||
| Case study | 13 | undated | ASPM, SAST | ||
| Report or ebook | 12 | undated | ASPM | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 11 | undated | ASPM | ||
| Podcast or video | 8 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 6 | undated | ASPM, CSPM | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated |
Every page apiiro.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Apiiro's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: apiiro.com, trust.apiiro.com, apiiro.com/platform, apiiro.com/customers, apiiro.com/company/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Apiiro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Apiiro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Apiiro by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: