Every category where a model named Veracode Security Labs for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Secure code training	Developer platform	0%	21 of 97	11%	19	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Veracode Security Labs yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Veracode Security Labs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	1	4
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	3	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels1

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative18 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Veracode if you want training closely aligned with an existing AppSec scanning/remediation stack.” GPT-5.4 mini · Secure code training · comparative prompt · alternative

“Veracode Security Labs shines for teams already invested in the Veracode ecosystem” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Secure code training · comparative prompt · alternative

“their native secure code training integrates seamlessly with their existing platforms” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secure code training · scale prompt · alternative

“Veracode Security Labs fits teams already standardized on Veracode scanning.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Secure code training · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Veracode Security Labs is more of a "high-cost, high-friction" concern than a quality problem per se.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Secure code training · negative prompt · soft negative

“bundled pricing, but steeper for mid-market” Grok 4.1 Fast · Secure code training · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Veracode Security Labs, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Veracode Security Labs was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Secure Code Warrior40 of 4823Not among the top eight

SecureFlag33 of 4811Not among the top eight

Security Journey32 of 481Not among the top eight

Checkmarx Codebashing14 of 480Not among the top eight

SafeStack Academy13 of 482Not among the top eight

Avatao10 of 480Not among the top eight

Codebashing9 of 481Not among the top eight

Snyk Learn8 of 482Not among the top eight

AppSecEngineer7 of 480Not among the top eight

RansomLeak6 of 480Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Veracode Security Labs. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 48 answers that named Veracode Security Labs and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ransomleak.com38

gartner.com36

securityjourney.com32

g2.com31

sourceforge.net31

f6s.com24

securecodewarrior.com24

secureflag.com19

veracode.comYour site19

blog.secureflag.com18

253 of the 272 domain citations in answers naming Veracode Security Labs came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ransomleak.com/blog/best-secure-coding-training-202638

gartner.com/reviews/market/secure-code-training-tools35

securityjourney.com/secure-development-training22

g2.com/categories/secure-code-training20

f6s.com/software/category/secure-coding-training18

sourceforge.net/software/secure-code-training17

blog.secureflag.com/2026/09/25/best-secure-coding-training-platforms16

secureflag.com/training16

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

veracode.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Veracode Security Labs takes 0% of first choices and SecureFlag takes 26%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “secure code training platform”

Position for “secure code training platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 20 a month (“veracode security labs”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its company's site: veracode.com shared with Veracode's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site: about 12,543 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,691 · 181 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 9,588
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

22 ads · 17 image, 3 text, 2 video · 17 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2026, as Veracode, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 22 in the year. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 21 of 97 in secure code training

Segment leader

26%

SecureFlag

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 48 answers
Its own site cited: in 48 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Veracode Security Labs

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Veracode Security Labs; a claim can dispute any of them.

Veracode Security Labs & eLearning 1Veracode Security Labs / training content 1

Follow Veracode Security Labs

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Veracode is the company behind Veracode Security Labs.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Veracode: Veracode DAST, Veracode Developer Training, Veracode Dynamic Analysis, Veracode Risk Manager, Veracode Secure Code Training, Veracode Training

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: As a Security Labs learner, you are assigned labs or lessons through campaigns. A campaign has a set of related lessons.
docs.veracode.com/r/Learn_Security_Labs
For: a Security Labs learner
docs.veracode.com/r/Learn_Security_Labs
Certifications: level 1, 2, and 3 certification badgeslevel 1, 2, and 3 certification badges when they complete 100, 200, and 300 points worth of labs, respectively
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers

What Veracode Security Labs's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: docs.veracode.com/r/Learn_Security_Labs, docs.veracode.com/r/Security_Labs_users, docs.veracode.com/r/Access_Security_Labs, docs.veracode.com/r/Veracode_Security_Labs, docs.veracode.com/r/Security_Labs_learning. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Veracode Security Labs's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Veracode Security Labs, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Veracode Security Labs by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Veracode Security Labs is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Veracode Security Labs, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.