Checkmarx · 1 category · RankedCheckmarx One
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Static application security testing | Developer platform | 0% | 44 of 47 | 48% | 46 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 8 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Consistently ranked as a market leader (Gartner/Forrester)... Choose Checkmarx/Veracode if you are a large enterprise” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SAST · comparative prompt · first choice
“Enterprise leader for comprehensive suites. ... Scale to Checkmarx/Snyk for enterprise.” Grok 4.1 Fast · SAST · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best enterprise all-rounders: Checkmarx, Veracode, HCL AppScan” GPT-5.4 mini · SAST · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best overall enterprise choice: Checkmarx or Veracode” Perplexity Sonar · SAST · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Tools to Avoid on a Tight Budget ... Checkmarx One / Fortify / Vercode: These are enterprise-grade tools” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SAST · budget prompt · hard negative
“traditional enterprise legacy tools (like Checkmarx or Veracode) are usually too expensive, slow, and noisy” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SAST · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools like Checkmarx and Veracode unless you have an established enterprise budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SAST · budget prompt · hard negative
“Why Legacy Tools (Veracode, Checkmarx, Fortify) are Usually Wrong for Mid-Market B2B” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SAST · direct prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 116 of the 138 answers that named Checkmarx One and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
509 of the 560 domain citations in answers naming Checkmarx One came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Checkmarx One
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Checkmarx One's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Checkmarx One, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at checkmarx.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.