IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Trellix Endpoint Security Suite · September 2026 Edition

Trellix · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Trellix Endpoint Security Suite

4Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Trellix Endpoint Security Suite was named 1 time in Endpoint protection, where Microsoft Defender for Cloud led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business86 of 89

under the label threshold

Mid-market59 of 99

under the label threshold

Enterprise58 of 82

under the label threshold

In endpoint protection · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Trellix Endpoint Security Suite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Endpoint protection	IT operations and endpoint	0%	59 of 99	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Cloud at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Trellix Endpoint Security Suite yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Trellix Endpoint Security Suite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trellix Endpoint Security Suite, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trellix Endpoint Security Suite was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Defender for Cloud2 of 42Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon2 of 41Not in the top three

Bitdefender GravityZone2 of 40Not in the top three

Kaspersky Endpoint Security2 of 40Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint2 of 40Not in the top three

Sophos Intercept X2 of 40Not in the top three

Bitdefender1 of 40Not in the top three

Bitdefender GravityZone SBS1 of 40Not in the top three

Check Point Harmony Endpoint1 of 40Not in the top three

Cisco Secure Endpoint1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trellix Endpoint Security Suite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Trellix Endpoint Security Suite and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

av-comparatives.org2

cnicsolutions.com2

community.spiceworks.com2

ifeeltech.com2

reddit.com2

selabs.uk2

solutionsinsider.com2

antivirus-review.com1

av-test.org1

capterra.com1

Seventeen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming Trellix Endpoint Security Suite came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cnicsolutions.com/cybersecurity-threat-protection/detection-response/best-endpoint-protect2

solutionsinsider.com/endpoint-security-solutions/top-endpoint-security-solutions-for-smbs2

antivirus-review.com/business-antivirus1

av-comparatives.org/tests/business-security-test-march-april-2026-factsheet1

av-comparatives.org/tests/endpoint-prevention-response-epr-test-20241

av-comparatives.org/tests/endpoint-prevention-response-epr-test-20251

av-test.org/en/antivirus/business-windows-client/windows-11/june-2026/norton-small-busines1

capterra.com.au/reviews/151734/mcafee-endpoint-security1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Trellix Endpoint Security Suite

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Trellix Endpoint Security Suite; a claim can dispute any of them.

Trellix Endpoint Security 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trellix Endpoint Security Suite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trellix Endpoint Security Suite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at trellix.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.