Every category where a model named Trellix NDR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Network detection and response	Security operations	0%	65 of 102	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Trellix NDR yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Trellix NDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Users find initial setup and policy configuration laborious, require further tuning to reduce false alarms, and IPS engines leave some critical events unblocked” GLM 4.7 FlashX · NDR · negative prompt · soft negative

“some public reviews of Trellix NDR mention false positives and a need for strong vendor support during rollout” GPT-5.4 mini · NDR · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trellix NDR, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trellix NDR was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Darktrace24 of 265Not among the top eight

Vectra AI21 of 263Not among the top eight

Corelight Open NDR18 of 260Not among the top eight

ExtraHop RevealX15 of 263Not among the top eight

Cisco Secure Network Analytics10 of 260Not among the top eight

Fortinet FortiNDR9 of 260Not among the top eight

Trend Vision One9 of 260Not among the top eight

ExtraHop Reveal6 of 261Not among the top eight

Arista NDR6 of 260Not among the top eight

NetWitness4 of 260Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trellix NDR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 26 answers that named Trellix NDR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ciopages.com18

fidelissecurity.com13

g2.com13

gartner.com12

vectra.ai12

comparitech.com11

guideflow.com11

netwitness.com11

extrahop.com9

myhospitalnow.com8

118 of the 118 domain citations in answers naming Trellix NDR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/network-detection-response18

comparitech.com/net-admin/network-detection-response-software11

gartner.com/reviews/market/network-detection-and-response10

guideflow.com/blog/network-detection-and-response-software10

netwitness.com/blog/best-ndr-vendors-for-enterprises8

cybersecuritynews.com/best-ndr-solutions7

fidelissecurity.com/threatgeek/network-security/top-network-detection-and-response-solutio7

rfp.wiki/it-security/network-detection-response/darktrace7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

trellix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Trellix NDR takes 0% of first choices and ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer takes 21%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ndr platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “ndr platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 30 a month (“trellix ndr”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its company's site: trellix.com shared with Trellix's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site: about 71,321 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 7,391 · 524 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 11,022
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 65 of 102 in NDR

Segment leader

21%

ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 26 answers
Its own site cited: in 26 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Trellix NDR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Trellix NDR; a claim can dispute any of them.

Trellix 4

Follow Trellix NDR

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Trellix is the company behind Trellix NDR.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Trellix: Trellix (McAfee) DLP, Trellix (McAfee) Endpoint Security, Trellix DLP, Trellix Data Loss Prevention, Trellix EDR, Trellix Endpoint Security Suite, Trellix XDR, Trellix XDR for SMBs

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trellix NDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trellix NDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trellix NDR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Trellix NDR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trellix NDR, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.