Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 of 38, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedTactical RMM
11Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Tactical RMM was named 5 times in RMM, where NinjaOne led with 47%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 40
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market10 of 62
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In rmm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Tactical RMM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remote monitoring and management | IT operations and endpoint | 2% | 10 of 62 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by NinjaOne at 47% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Tactical RMM held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · RMM · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 10 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMM | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 10 of 62 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Tactical RMM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Tactical RMM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labels2
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“TacticalRMM is the strongest free RMM option available, fully open-source and self-hosted” Claude Haiku 4.5 · RMM · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose Tactical RMM if you have the technical skills to host and maintain your own server” Gemini 3.5 Flash · RMM · budget prompt · alternative
“Best if you have zero budget: TacticalRMM, MSP360 Community Edition, or LogMeIn Resolve.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · RMM · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Do not use them to manage commercial clients unless you have a dedicated security operations team” Gemini 3.5 Flash · RMM · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tactical RMM, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tactical RMM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tactical RMM, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tactical RMM was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tactical RMM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Tactical RMM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
atera.com6
blog.domotz.com6
g2.com5
reddit.com5
spotsaas.com5
superops.com5
syncrosecure.com5
breezermm.com4
aimultiple.com3
cloudnuro.ai3
Forty-seven of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming Tactical RMM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
tacticalrmm.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Tactical RMM takes 2% of first choices and NinjaOne takes 47%.ShowHide
Search and answers
tacticalrmm.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Tactical RMM takes 2% of first choices and NinjaOne takes 47%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “rmm platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “rmm platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“tactical rmm”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 14 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 440 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 73 · 5 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 473
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 62 in RMM
Segment leader
47%
NinjaOne
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Tactical RMM
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tactical RMM; a claim can dispute any of them.
TacticalRMM 2
Follow Tactical RMM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Tactical RMM is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Tactical RMM is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- A powerful remote monitoring & management tool built on a foundation of security and transparency
- For
- MSPs and IT technicians
- Price stated
- Pricing is sensible—free to start or month-to-month with no contracts tacticalrmm.com
- Starting price
- $ 55 /month tacticalrmm.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- free to start tacticalrmm.com
- Customers named
- VinotechniekMyTech 24-7AssendTekHCSSalisbury ITLead Cloud SolutionsJon LVince
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Tactical RMM's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: tacticalrmm.com, tacticalrmm.com/pricing, tacticalrmm.com/features. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tactical RMM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tactical RMM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tactical RMM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Tactical RMM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Tactical RMM, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.