IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Itarian · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Itarian

9Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
5 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Itarian was named 4 times in RMM, where NinjaOne led with 50%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In rmm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Itarian for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Remote monitoring and managementIT operations and endpoint0%40 of 5750%4under 10 labels · led by NinjaOne at 50%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Itarian yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Itarian across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00011
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“multiple web-based phishing campaigns were documented dropping the RMM tools ITarian (aka Comodo), PDQ, SimpleHelp, and Atera” Claude Haiku 4.5 · RMM · negative prompt · soft negative
“You should exercise caution with the following:” Mistral Small · RMM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Itarian, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Itarian was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Atera6 of 92Not in the top three
NinjaOne6 of 92Not in the top three
Syncro6 of 92Not in the top three
Action15 of 92Not in the top three
Datto RMM5 of 90Not in the top three
N-able N-sight4 of 90Not in the top three
SuperOps4 of 90Not in the top three
ConnectWise ScreenConnect3 of 90Not in the top three
ManageEngine Endpoint Central3 of 90Not in the top three
SimpleHelp3 of 90Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Itarian. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 9 answers that named Itarian and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aimultiple.com5
syncrosecure.com5
expertinsights.com4
superops.com4
comparitech.com3
g2.com3
redcanary.com3
reddit.com3
system.plus3
acronis.com2

Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming Itarian came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Itarian

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Itarian; a claim can dispute any of them.
ITarian 1ITarian (aka Comodo) 1Itarian RMM 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Itarian's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Itarian, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at itarian.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.