| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIOps platforms | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 26 of 93 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 17% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If your data lives in Splunk: Splunk ITSI offers deep analytics and ML playbooks on top of that data.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AIOps · comparative prompt · alternative
“Splunk is strongest when the organization already centralizes logs and service intelligence there” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AIOps · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Splunk ITSI if: You are deeply invested in the Splunk ecosystem” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AIOps · comparative prompt · alternative
“Widely used for service‑level intelligence on Splunk data” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AIOps · negative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“older Splunk ITSI or vendor-specific like Dell) lack strong unstructured log analysis” Grok 4.1 Fast · AIOps · negative prompt · soft negative
“Powerful in enterprise environments, but can be expensive and operationally heavy” Perplexity Sonar · AIOps · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 33 answers that named Splunk ITSI and are not a share of its labels.
124 of the 124 domain citations in answers naming Splunk ITSI came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Splunk ITSI's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: splunk.com/de_de/form/it-service-intelligence-itsi-demo.html, splunk.com/en_us/form/it-service-intelligence-itsi-demo.html, lantern.splunk.com/Observability_Use_Cases/Monitor_Business/Accelerating_ITSI_event_management, community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-ITSI/bd-p/it-it-service-intelligence, help.splunk.com/en/splunk-observability-cloud/splunk-it-service-intelligence/it-operations-product-overview. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Splunk ITSI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Splunk ITSI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Splunk ITSI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: