AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › ServiceNow ITOM · October 2026 Edition
ServiceNow · 1 category · Ranked

ServiceNow ITOM

50Judge labels
2First choices
21Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in AIOps for enterprise buyers
Rank 53 of 93 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 36% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ServiceNow ITOM →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In aiops · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ServiceNow ITOM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AIOps platformsIT operations and endpoint0%53 of 9336%11criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ServiceNow ITOM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ServiceNow ITOM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00022
Grok 4.2000112
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labels2
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative50 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you're already on ServiceNow: ServiceNow ITOM provides ITSM + AI agents and workflows in a single platform.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AIOps · comparative prompt · alternative
“Already using ServiceNow | ServiceNow ITOM (leverages existing CMDB)” Kimi K2 · AIOps · scale prompt · alternative
“Already use ServiceNow | ServiceNow ITOM” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AIOps · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Strong when ITSM is already central, but some evaluations note the need for mature CMDB/workflow discipline and the risk of duplication” Perplexity Sonar · AIOps · negative prompt · soft negative
“enterprise-heavy suites like ServiceNow or Dynatrace, which are often described as powerful but expensive/complex” GPT-5.4 mini · AIOps · budget prompt · soft negative
“ServiceNow ITOM, and BigPanda often use quote-based or consumption models that escalate quickly” Grok 4.20 · AIOps · negative prompt · soft negative
“Strong platform, but analyst reports position it heavily in enterprise-oriented evaluations.” Perplexity Sonar · AIOps · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ServiceNow ITOM, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ServiceNow ITOM was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Dynatrace41 of 5011Not among the top eight
Datadog30 of 504Not among the top eight
BigPanda27 of 506Not among the top eight
New Relic19 of 503Not among the top eight
PagerDuty15 of 502Not among the top eight
Atera12 of 508Not among the top eight
Moogsoft11 of 500Not among the top eight
OpenObserve9 of 503Not among the top eight
Splunk ITSI9 of 500Not among the top eight
Coralogix8 of 502Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ServiceNow ITOM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 50 answers that named ServiceNow ITOM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

motadata.com39
coralogix.com25
g2.com25
openobserve.ai25
zapier.com21
guideflow.com16
moveworks.com14
newrelic.com14
gartner.com12
monday.com12

203 of the 203 domain citations in answers naming ServiceNow ITOM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where ServiceNow ITOM stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
1,000 a month (“servicenow itom”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
29 a month
Its own site
It sits on ServiceNow's site (servicenow.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 53 of 93 in aiops
Segment leader
17%
New Relic
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
50 answers
Its own site cited
in 48 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as ServiceNow ITOM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ServiceNow ITOM; a claim can dispute any of them.
ServiceNow 2ServiceNow ITOM & AIOps 1ServiceNow ITOM (IT Operations Management) 1

Follow ServiceNow ITOM

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ServiceNow is the company behind ServiceNow ITOM.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
ServiceNow ITOM solutions across CMDB and service data foundations, Discovery, Service Mapping, ITOM Health, event intelligence, and service observability
Certifications
CIS-Data FoundationsCIS-DiscoveryCIS-Service MappingCIS-Event Management
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers

What ServiceNow ITOM's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: careers.servicenow.com/jobs/744000151461304/itom-solution-architect. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ServiceNow ITOM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ServiceNow ITOM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ServiceNow ITOM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ServiceNow ITOM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ServiceNow ITOM, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at servicenow.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.