| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIOps platforms | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 53 of 93 | 36% | 11 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you're already on ServiceNow: ServiceNow ITOM provides ITSM + AI agents and workflows in a single platform.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AIOps · comparative prompt · alternative
“Already using ServiceNow | ServiceNow ITOM (leverages existing CMDB)” Kimi K2 · AIOps · scale prompt · alternative
“Already use ServiceNow | ServiceNow ITOM” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AIOps · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Strong when ITSM is already central, but some evaluations note the need for mature CMDB/workflow discipline and the risk of duplication” Perplexity Sonar · AIOps · negative prompt · soft negative
“enterprise-heavy suites like ServiceNow or Dynatrace, which are often described as powerful but expensive/complex” GPT-5.4 mini · AIOps · budget prompt · soft negative
“ServiceNow ITOM, and BigPanda often use quote-based or consumption models that escalate quickly” Grok 4.20 · AIOps · negative prompt · soft negative
“Strong platform, but analyst reports position it heavily in enterprise-oriented evaluations.” Perplexity Sonar · AIOps · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 50 answers that named ServiceNow ITOM and are not a share of its labels.
203 of the 203 domain citations in answers naming ServiceNow ITOM came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What ServiceNow ITOM's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: careers.servicenow.com/jobs/744000151461304/itom-solution-architect. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ServiceNow ITOM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ServiceNow ITOM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ServiceNow ITOM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: