| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application security posture management | Developer platform | 0% | 15 of 70 | 13% | 15 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Is already heavily invested in Snyk's ecosystem and wants ASPM tightly integrated into their existing workflow | Snyk AppRisk” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ASPM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Snyk AppRisk (and AppRisk Pro) acts as the ASPM control plane for Snyk's widely adopted developer security ecosystem.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ASPM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Companies already invested in the Snyk ecosystem who want ASPM without switching vendors.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASPM · direct prompt · alternative
“if your developers already work in Snyk and you want to extend that existing workflow” GPT-6 Luna · ASPM · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“ASPM platforms like Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode, OX Security, AccuKnox, and Snyk AppRisk aggregate security findings into a unified posture view; they cannot test a compiled mobile binary” Muse Glimmer 30B · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative
“called out as having a significant blind spot” Kimi K2 · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 36 answers that named Snyk AppRisk and are not a share of its labels.
173 of the 173 domain citations in answers naming Snyk AppRisk came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Snyk AppRisk's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: updates.snyk.io/snyk-apprisk-pro-now-available-291939, updates.snyk.io/snyk-apprisk-view-only-permission-284480, updates.snyk.io/apprisk-improved-edit-integration-profile-297139, updates.snyk.io/apprisk-more-application-context-integration-297178, updates.snyk.io/snyk-apprisk-bring-backstage-data-into-apprisk-288976. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Snyk AppRisk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Snyk AppRisk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Snyk AppRisk by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: