Every category where a model named Snyk Learn for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Secure code training	Developer platform	2%	7 of 97	0%	17	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Snyk Learn yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Snyk Learn across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	4	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	1	1	0	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels1

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative12 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained17 labels6

Scale-constrained6 labels1

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative55 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If budget is the main constraint, start with Snyk Learn.” GPT-6 Luna · Secure code training · budget prompt · first choice

“If you already use Snyk or Veracode for application scanning, their native secure code training integrates seamlessly” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secure code training · scale prompt · alternative

“Go with Snyk Learn. It leverages your existing workflow to deliver bite-sized training with minimal overhead.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secure code training · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Choose Snyk Learn if you want a modern, managed SaaS platform that focuses strictly on code-level remediation” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secure code training · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Snyk Learn, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Snyk Learn was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Secure Code Warrior41 of 557Compare →

SecureFlag37 of 5513Compare →

Security Journey29 of 552Compare →

SafeStack Academy18 of 558Compare →

Avatao15 of 550Not among the top eight

PortSwigger Web Security Academy8 of 553Not among the top eight

Veracode Security Labs8 of 550Not among the top eight

Codebashing7 of 551Not among the top eight

SANS7 of 550Not among the top eight

Wizer7 of 550Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Snyk Learn. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 55 answers that named Snyk Learn and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ransomleak.com38

sourceforge.net36

securityjourney.com28

g2.com26

securecodewarrior.com25

slashdot.org24

gartner.com23

blog.secureflag.com22

us.fitgap.com19

secureflag.com16

257 of the 257 domain citations in answers naming Snyk Learn came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ransomleak.com/blog/best-secure-coding-training-202637

gartner.com/reviews/market/secure-code-training-tools23

blog.secureflag.com/2026/09/25/best-secure-coding-training-platforms22

sourceforge.net/software/secure-code-training22

sourceforge.net/software/compare/HCL-AppScan-vs-Synopsys-Security-Training18

g2.com/categories/secure-code-training17

securityjourney.com/secure-development-training15

f6s.com/software/category/secure-coding-training14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

snyk.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Snyk Learn takes 2% of first choices and SecureFlag takes 26%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “secure code training platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “secure code training platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 140 a month (“snyk learn”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its company's site: snyk.io shared with Snyk's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site: about 61,651 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 15,722 · 963 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 21,121
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 92 text, 28 image · 60 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2023, as Snyk Limited, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 110 in the year, 10 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 7 of 97 in secure code training

Segment leader

26%

SecureFlag

First choices: 8 across its categories
Named in: 55 answers
Its own site cited: in 55 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Snyk Learn

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Snyk is the company behind Snyk Learn.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Snyk: Snyk ASPM, Snyk AppRisk, Snyk Code, Snyk Container, Snyk Free Tier, Snyk Open Source

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: a new Snyk Learn engagement report in Snyk Reporting at the group level
updates.snyk.io/snyk-learn-engagement-report
For: teams
updates.snyk.io/snyk-learn-engagement-report
Free plan or trial: Free and Team plans no longer have access to Snyk Learn reporting updates.snyk.io/snyk-learn-reporting-update-310224
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Snyk Learn's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: updates.snyk.io/snyk-learn-engagement-report, updates.snyk.io/learning-programs-early-access, updates.snyk.io/snyk-learn-reporting-update-310224, updates.snyk.io/snyk-learn-lesson-roundup-whats-new-in-may, updates.snyk.io/connect-dast-findings-to-snyk-learn-lessons. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Snyk Learn's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Snyk Learn, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Snyk Learn by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Snyk Learn is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Snyk Learn, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.