Snyk · 1 category · RankedSnyk Open Source
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software composition analysis | Developer platform | 16% | 2 of 49 | 15% | 47 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For many teams, Snyk, Mend.io (formerly WhiteSource), and Sonatype (Nexus IQ/Black Duck) are considered leaders” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SCA · negative prompt · first choice
“Choose Snyk if you want to empower developers to fix issues quickly without leaving their IDE or CI pipeline.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SCA · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Snyk Open Source — it gives you the fastest developer adoption and integrated remediation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SCA · direct prompt · first choice
“Shortlist 3-5: Snyk (dev-first)... Developer-first tools (Snyk, Endor) prevent security bottlenecks.” Grok 4.1 Fast · SCA · scale prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“The industry heavyweight with top-tier developer UX, strong remediation suggestions, and a wide ecosystem, though it can be highly expensive.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SCA · scale prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious with tools like Snyk if you're at scale or in a regulated environment, because they're known to generate significant noise” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SCA · negative prompt · soft negative
“its paid plans are typically around the mid-$20s to $30 per developer per month, so it is not the cheapest option” Perplexity Sonar · SCA · budget prompt · soft negative
“Frequent complaints of noise/UI complexity/slow large-repo scans (G2/PeerSpot)... scales poorly without tuning.” Grok 4.1 Fast · SCA · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 121 of the 143 answers that named Snyk Open Source and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
541 of the 541 domain citations in answers naming Snyk Open Source came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Snyk Open Source
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Snyk Open Source's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Snyk Open Source, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at snyk.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.