Every category where a model named Conviso Platform for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Application security posture management	Developer platform	4%	8 of 70	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Conviso Platform yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Conviso Platform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels3

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best ASPM (Application Security Posture Management) platform is Conviso Platform, particularly its free plan” Grok 4.1 Fast · ASPM · budget prompt · first choice

“Conviso Platform currently the most quoted low-entry full ASPM platform” Muse Glimmer 30B · ASPM · budget prompt · first choice

“Conviso Platform – free plan for up to 5 contributing devs, 5 assets, 10 users; $19/dev/mo after that.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ASPM · budget prompt · alternative

“ArmorCode (orchestration hub) or Conviso” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ASPM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Conviso Platform, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Conviso Platform was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Aikido Security18 of 2111Not among the top eight

Snyk10 of 212Not among the top eight

DefectDojo9 of 211Not among the top eight

ArmorCode8 of 210Not among the top eight

Checkmarx One6 of 210Not among the top eight

Cycode ASPM6 of 210Not among the top eight

Plexicus ASPM6 of 210Not among the top eight

Jit5 of 210Not among the top eight

Legit Security5 of 210Not among the top eight

Snyk AppRisk5 of 210Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Conviso Platform. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named Conviso Platform and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

itechguides.com20

expertinsights.com16

plexicus.ai13

appsecsanta.com12

guideflow.com11

sourceforge.net11

aikido.dev10

checkmarx.com10

cycode.com10

g2.com10

No domain is on file for Conviso Platform, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

itechguides.com/best/application-security-posture-management-software18

expertinsights.com/application-security/the-top-application-security-posture-management-as15

plexicus.ai/blog/review/10-best-aspm-tools-unify-application-security-code-to-cloud-visibi12

guideflow.com/blog/aspm-software11

aikido.dev/blog/top-7-aspm-tools10

expertinsights.com/devsecops/the-top-application-security-posture-management-aspm-tools10

cycode.com/blog/best-application-secuirty-posture-management-tools9

geeksframework.com/software/application-security-posture-management-aspm9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Conviso Platform stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“conviso platform”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 8 of 70 in ASPM

Segment leader

37%

Aikido Security

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 21 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Conviso Platform

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Conviso Platform's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Conviso Platform, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Conviso Platform by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Conviso Platform is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Conviso Platform, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.