Every category where a model named Snyk Code for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Static application security testing	Developer platform	13%	3 of 47	6%	36	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Snyk Code yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Snyk Code across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	3	0	0	4
Mistral Small	0	2	1	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	4	2	0	6
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2	0	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	1	3
Kimi K2	2	1	1	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	1	0	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct20 labels7

Paraphrase13 labels3

Comparative31 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained11 labels3

Scale-constrained11 labels1

Negative18 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative104 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Snyk Code - A developer-first SAST tool that integrates with IDE and CI/CD pipelines, suitable for startup to mid-market teams” Llama 4 Maverick · SAST · direct prompt · first choice

“I'd usually start with Snyk Code for teams that want a developer-friendly experience and faster adoption” GPT-5.4 mini · SAST · direct prompt · first choice

“For most mid-market B2B companies, SonarQube or Snyk Code would be the best starting points.” MiniMax M2.5 · SAST · direct prompt · first choice

“For most mid-market B2B companies, I'd suggest evaluating Snyk Code or Semgrep first” Kimi K2 · SAST · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Modern, developer-friendly platforms (such as Snyk Code)... keep their rule engine highly proprietary... they can restrict highly advanced security teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SAST · negative prompt · soft negative

“While popular, pricing starts at ~$25/developer/month, which can add up quickly” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SAST · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Snyk Code, over the 104 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Snyk Code was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Semgrep97 of 10440Compare →

SonarQube88 of 1046Compare →

Checkmarx One82 of 10415Not in the top three

Veracode64 of 1043Not in the top three

OpenText Fortify53 of 1040Not in the top three

CodeQL44 of 1041Not in the top three

Aikido Security29 of 1041Not in the top three

Black Duck Coverity22 of 1040Not in the top three

Bandit16 of 1040Not in the top three

ZeroPath15 of 1040Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Snyk Code. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 92 of the 104 answers that named Snyk Code and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

zeropath.com57

appsecsanta.com54

corgea.com54

dev.to50

augmentcode.com48

pixee.ai43

ox.security37

checkmarx.com35

cycode.com30

safeguard.sh29

437 of the 437 domain citations in answers naming Snyk Code came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

zeropath.com/blog/best-sast-tools56

corgea.com/learn/best-sast-tools45

dev.to/rahulxsingh/i-reviewed-32-sast-tools-the-ones-worth-using-283e43

ox.security/blog/static-application-security-sast-tools37

pixee.ai/blog/best-sast-tools-202637

augmentcode.com/tools/enterprise-sast-tools-large-teams-field-guide35

appsecsanta.com/sast-tools30

checkmarx.com/learn/sast/open-source-vs-premium-sast-tools26

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Snyk Code's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Snyk Code, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at snykcode.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.