Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 of 77, unchanged
2 categories · RankedNetwrix Endpoint Protector
61Judge labels
2First choices
7Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in DLP for mid-market buyers
Rank 7 of 89 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Netwrix Endpoint Protector →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 82
2%38 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market7 of 89
2%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise20 of 60
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In dlp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Netwrix Endpoint Protector for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data loss prevention | Security operations | 2% | 7 of 89 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data security posture management | Security operations | 0% | 74 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview at 18% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Netwrix Endpoint Protector held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · DLP · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 13 → 8 of 80
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 33 → 19 of 55
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLP | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 7 of 89 |
| DSPM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 74 of 105, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Netwrix Endpoint Protector across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Netwrix Endpoint Protector across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labelsNone
Paraphrase12 labels1
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained10 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative61 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“or Endpoint Protector's free version, then scaling up as needs grow” MiniMax M2.5 · DLP · budget prompt · first choice
“CurrentWare, Safetica, Nightfall AI, and Netwrix Endpoint Protector are more realistic than heavy enterprise platforms.” Muse Glimmer 30B · DLP · budget prompt · alternative
“Endpoint Protector specializes in device-level DLP with strong control over USB ports, external storage, and printers” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DLP · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Complementary add‑on: Endpoint Protector (if endpoint leakage is a concern)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DLP · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Netwrix Endpoint Protector, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Netwrix Endpoint Protector was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Netwrix Endpoint Protector, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Netwrix Endpoint Protector was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Netwrix Endpoint Protector. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 57 of the 58 answers that named Netwrix Endpoint Protector and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
currentware.com48
miniorange.com31
kickidler.com30
learn.g2.com29
spotsaas.com26
aimultiple.com25
strac.io24
underdefense.com24
g2.com21
forcepoint.com17
275 of the 275 domain citations in answers naming Netwrix Endpoint Protector came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
netwrix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Netwrix Endpoint Protector takes 2% of first choices and Microsoft Purview DLP takes 46%.ShowHide
Search and answers
netwrix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Netwrix Endpoint Protector takes 2% of first choices and Microsoft Purview DLP takes 46%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “data loss prevention platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “data loss prevention platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110 a month (“netwrix endpoint protector”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 104,208 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 17,554 · 1,072 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 7,338
- Paid Google search
- 4 searches its ads show for, about 67 clicks and $3,789 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 7 of 89 in DLP
Segment leader
46%
Microsoft Purview DLP
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 58 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 57 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on netwrix.com
10,010
subdomains included
Content
1,442
counted in the table below
Documentation
7,965
Product · Integration
105 · 5
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 581 | 0 | 2025-01-16 | DLP, PAM | |
| Report or ebook | 326 | 0 | 2026-02-02 | DLP, PAM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 208 | 7 | 2026-10-15 | DLP, IGA | |
| News or press | 121 | 1 | 2026-08-18 | PAM, IGA | |
| Case study | 85 | 0 | 2025-09-19 | ||
| Comparison | 60 | 4 | 2026-09-14 | DLP, IGA | |
| Glossary or explainer | 33 | 0 | 2025-05-07 | ASM, IGA | |
| Podcast or video | 15 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 9 | 0 | 2026-01-31 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 1 | 2026-07-28 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-15Deploying ai without losing control of it webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-24The linux blind spot why ai infrastructure is outrunning your dlp coverage webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-24L automatisation comme vecteur de roi la place de l iam dans un monde d ia webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-24Turning signals into action alerts in 1secure webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-23The data you can t see is the data you can t protect webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-23The two way street using ai to govern identity and governing the identities of ai webinar or virtual event
Events in person
Upcoming
- December 7, 2026 to December 9, 2026Gartner NAM IAM Summit 2026Las Vegas · attends
Last twelve months
- October 27, 2026 to October 29, 2026it-saNuremberg · attended
- October 20, 2026Identity Days 2026NewCap Event Center, Paris X · attended
- October 7, 2026 to October 9, 2026Les Assises de la Cybersécurité 2026Grimaldi Forum, Monaco · exhibited
As the event pages on netwrix.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page netwrix.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Netwrix Endpoint Protector
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Netwrix Endpoint Protector; a claim can dispute any of them.
Endpoint Protector 3Endpoint Protector (CoSoSys/Netwrix) 1Endpoint Protector (Netwrix) 1Endpoint Protector (by CoSoSys) 1Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys 1Netwrix 1
Follow Netwrix Endpoint Protector
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Netwrix Endpoint Protector is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Netwrix Endpoint Protector is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Block unauthorized data transfers and exfiltration via USB, email, browsers, messaging apps, and other common outbound channels.
- Price stated
- Request pricing netwrix.com/en/pricing
- Certifications
- CCPAGDPRSOC 2 Type 1SOC 2 Type 2
- Customers named
- Samsung R&D InstituteSteinel Normalien AGSamsung SDSNHS South East Coast AmbulanceLiebherr IbéricaKompanion BankJFE EngineeringInnovaccer
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Netwrix Endpoint Protector's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: netwrix.com, netwrix.com/en/pricing, trust.netwrix.com, netwrix.com/en/platform, netwrix.com/en/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Netwrix Endpoint Protector's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Netwrix Endpoint Protector, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Netwrix Endpoint Protector by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Netwrix Endpoint Protector is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Netwrix Endpoint Protector, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.