Every category where a model named Netwrix Endpoint Protector for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Data loss prevention	Security operations	0%	13 of 84	12%	16	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Netwrix Endpoint Protector yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Netwrix Endpoint Protector across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	1	1	4
Mistral Small	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labelsNone

Paraphrase11 labelsNone

Comparative12 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained11 labels1

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative10 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative62 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“highly suited for SMBs/mid-market companies that just need compliance checkmarks and basic device control” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DLP · scale prompt · alternative

“For more advanced cross-channel DLP, consider Forcepoint or CoSoSys (Endpoint Protector).” Mistral Small · DLP · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“best if you need consistent cross-platform endpoint control across Windows, macOS, and Linux” Perplexity Sonar · DLP · direct prompt · alternative

“Cross-platform (Win/Mac/Linux) device/USB control, content-aware DLP, offline enforcement.” Grok 4.1 Fast · DLP · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Evaluations of DLP products from CoSoSys, DeviceLock, GTB, MyDLP, OpenDLP, Sophos, Trend Micro and Websense found instances of basic security flaws in six of the eight products” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DLP · negative prompt · soft negative

“solid but opaque pricing” Grok 4.1 Fast · DLP · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Netwrix Endpoint Protector, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Netwrix Endpoint Protector was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Safetica45 of 608Not in the top three

CurrentWare44 of 6020Not in the top three

Microsoft Purview DLP42 of 6015Not in the top three

Nightfall AI39 of 609Not in the top three

Forcepoint DLP26 of 601Not in the top three

Symantec Data Loss Prevention23 of 600Not in the top three

miniOrange13 of 601Not in the top three

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP8 of 600Not in the top three

MyDLP6 of 600Not in the top three

OpenDLP5 of 600Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Netwrix Endpoint Protector. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 53 of the 60 answers that named Netwrix Endpoint Protector and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

currentware.com47

gartner.com39

learn.g2.com38

miniorange.com36

underdefense.com26

kickidler.com24

forcepoint.com23

consilien.com20

g2.com20

safetica.com18

291 of the 291 domain citations in answers naming Netwrix Endpoint Protector came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

currentware.com/blog/best-data-loss-prevention-software47

gartner.com/reviews/market/data-loss-prevention38

learn.g2.com/best-data-loss-prevention-software38

miniorange.com/blog/top-data-loss-prevention-tools34

underdefense.com/blog/dlp-solutions25

kickidler.com/reviews/top-best-data-loss-prevention-software-dlp.html24

forcepoint.com/blog/insights/best-dlp-software22

consilien.com/news/best-dlp-solutions-202620

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Netwrix Endpoint Protector

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Netwrix Endpoint Protector; a claim can dispute any of them.

Endpoint Protector 3CoSoSys 1CoSoSys (Endpoint Protector) 1Netwrix Endpoint Protector (formerly CoSoSys) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Netwrix Endpoint Protector's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Netwrix Endpoint Protector, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at netwrix.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.