Every category where a model named Rapid7 Threat Command for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Threat intelligence platforms	Security operations	11%	3 of 128	0%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Rapid7 Threat Command yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Rapid7 Threat Command across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels2

Paraphrase2 labels2

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 label1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Rapid7 Threat Command or NordStellar offer the best balance of actionability, coverage, and price” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Threat intel · direct prompt · first choice

“NordStellar or Rapid7 Threat Command as the platform, depending on your specific needs” Mistral Small · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd suggest starting with Rapid7 Threat Command or NordStellar” MiniMax M2.5 · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“NordStellar and Rapid7 Threat Command are the top choices” Mistral Small · Threat intel · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rapid7 Threat Command, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rapid7 Threat Command was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

NordStellar9 of 123Compare →

Recorded Future9 of 121Not in the top three

Flare6 of 121Not in the top three

SOCRadar3 of 122Not in the top three

Cyble Vision3 of 121Not in the top three

Anomali ThreatStream3 of 120Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon3 of 120Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence3 of 120Not in the top three

ThreatConnect2 of 120Not in the top three

SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence1 of 121Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rapid7 Threat Command. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 12 answers that named Rapid7 Threat Command and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

b2breviews.com11

learn.g2.com11

upguard.com10

underdefense.com8

analyticsinsight.net7

esecurityplanet.com6

trustradius.com6

threatintelreview.com5

expertinsights.com3

f6s.com3

Seventy of the seventy domain citations in answers naming Rapid7 Threat Command came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

b2breviews.com/threat-intelligence-platforms11

learn.g2.com/best-threat-intelligence-tools11

upguard.com/blog/best-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-vendors10

underdefense.com/blog/threat-detection-tools8

esecurityplanet.com/products/threat-intelligence-platforms6

trustradius.com/threat-intelligence6

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/10-best-threat-intelligence-platforms-in-20265

threatintelreview.com/posts/best-threat-intelligence-platforms-in-20265

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rapid7 Threat Command's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rapid7 Threat Command, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rapid7.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.