Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 109 → 20 of 114
1 category · RankedAnomali ThreatStream
110Judge labels
10First choices
35Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Threat intel for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 119 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 30% of its 40 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Anomali ThreatStream →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business26 of 126
2%30 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market3 of 119
10%40 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise2 of 83
6%40 labels
accepted challenger
In threat intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Anomali ThreatStream for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat intelligence platforms | Security operations | 10% | 3 of 119 | 30% | 40 | criticized challenger | ▲+9Since September 2026: 2% → 11%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Anomali ThreatStream held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Threat intel · by segment
Mid-market▲+9Since September 2026: 2% → 11%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 12 → 1 of 111
Enterprise▲+5Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 5 → 2 of 78
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat intel | 2% | 11% | ▲+9Since September 2026: 2% → 11%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 3 of 119 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Anomali ThreatStream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Anomali ThreatStream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct18 labels2
Paraphrase15 labels7
Comparative30 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained18 labels1
Negative22 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative110 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Evaluate Anomali or ThreatConnect's mid-market tiers, or your existing security vendor's intel add-ons.” Kimi K2 · Threat intel · scale prompt · first choice
“Recorded Future (feed) + EclecticIQ Fusion (free) or Anomali (SaaS)” MiniMax M2.5 · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I would recommend Anomali or Cyware as the platform” Perplexity Sonar · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Anomali ThreatStream is the strongest recommendation.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Verdict: Avoid unless you are a large enterprise with specific requirements for high-volume, automated ingestion” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Threat intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools like ThreatQuotient or Anomali ($10K+ annually).” Grok 4.20 · Threat intel · budget prompt · hard negative
“Anomali is flagged as enterprise-heavy and may not be the best fit” Mistral Small · Threat intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“platforms like Anomali, ThreatConnect, and OpenCTI don't collect their own threat data—they primarily route feeds you must purchase separately” Kimi K2 · Threat intel · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Anomali ThreatStream, over the 110 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Anomali ThreatStream was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Anomali ThreatStream, over the 110 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Anomali ThreatStream was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Anomali ThreatStream. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 102 of the 110 answers that named Anomali ThreatStream and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
upguard.com48
analyticsinsight.net35
vectra.ai34
it-ai-index.com33
learn.g2.com31
bitsight.com30
cyware.com30
esecurityplanet.com30
recordedfuture.com30
csoonline.com27
328 of the 328 domain citations in answers naming Anomali ThreatStream came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
anomali.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Anomali ThreatStream takes 10% of first choices and MISP takes 12%.ShowHide
Search and answers
anomali.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Anomali ThreatStream takes 10% of first choices and MISP takes 12%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “threat intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “threat intelligence platforms”
8
- Searches for its name, Google
- 140 a month (“anomali threatstream”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 13,320 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,060 · 79 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,973
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
10%
rank 3 of 119 in threat intel
Segment leader
12%
MISP
- First choices
- 10 across its categories
- Named in
- 110 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 102 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on anomali.com
1,247
subdomains included
Content
1,109
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
23 · 15
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 251 | 8 | 2026-09-22 | SIEM, XDR | |
| Conference or event | 234 | 7 | 2026-12-01 | XDR, SIEM | |
| Blog | 215 | 20 | 2026-09-29 | SIEM, Threat intel | |
| News or press | 178 | 0 | 2026-05-05 | Threat intel, XDR | |
| Glossary or explainer | 107 | undated | Threat intel, SIEM | ||
| Podcast or video | 68 | undated | SIEM, ASM | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 39 | undated | SIEM, XDR | ||
| Case study | 12 | 2 | 2026-08-04 | SIEM | |
| Comparison | 5 | 1 | 2026-07-06 | SIEM, XDR |
Most recent
- 2026-12-01Black hat mea 2026 conference or event
- 2026-11-12Isms forum conference or event
- 2026-10-27It sa 2026 conference or event
- 2026-10-06Sector 2026 conference or event
- 2026-09-29Anomali cyber watch blog
- 2026-09-28From feeds to agents what the ai shift asks of your data foundation blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- October 29, 2026it-sa Expo&Congress 2026Messezentrum Nürnberg · exhibited
- October 28, 2026it-sa Expo&Congress 2026Messezentrum Nürnberg · exhibited
- October 27, 2026it-sa Expo&Congress 2026Messezentrum Nürnberg · exhibited
- October 6, 2026 to October 8, 2026See you at SecTor 2026MTTC, Toronto, Canada · exhibited
- September 22, 2026 to September 24, 2026Gartner Security & Risk Management Summit 2026ExCeL London, London · attended
- November 18, 2025 to November 20, 2025Goldman Sachs 2025 Private Innovative Company ConferenceLas Vegas, United States · attended
As the event pages on anomali.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page anomali.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SIEM (47); 15 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Anomali ThreatStream
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Anomali ThreatStream; a claim can dispute any of them.
Anomali 19
Follow Anomali ThreatStream
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Anomali ThreatStream is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Anomali ThreatStream is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The industry’s leading threat intelligence platform (TIP) that provides curated access to the world’s largest repository of curated threat intelligence.
- For
- SOC Leader; CTI Teams
- Customers named
- Global EnterpriseNextgen AsiaBank of HopeBlackhawk Network HoldingsCastraRAKBANKInfinigate Group
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Anomali ThreatStream's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: anomali.com, anomali.com/security, anomali.com/platform, anomali.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Anomali ThreatStream's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Anomali ThreatStream, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Anomali ThreatStream by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Anomali ThreatStream is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Anomali ThreatStream, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Anomali ThreatStream is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Anomali ThreatStream is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAnomali ThreatStream is among the products AI models recommend first in Threat intelligence platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.