Every category where a model named Anomali ThreatStream for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Threat intelligence platforms	Security operations	0%	21 of 128	14%	14	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Anomali ThreatStream yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Anomali ThreatStream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	2	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labels1

Comparative18 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“offers the largest curated feed library and AI‑guided workflows, ideal for large enterprises” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Threat intel · comparative prompt · alternative

“Ingests 1K+ feeds, threat matching/hunting, free community sharing. Cost-effective basics.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Threat intel · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best alternative if you want broad built-in OSINT coverage: Anomali ThreatStream” Perplexity Sonar · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“SOCs wanting an accessible, well-rounded TIP with good SIEM integration.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Threat intel · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“criticized by security analysts for rigid APIs, complex or clunky user interfaces, and inconsistent naming conventions” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Threat intel · negative prompt · soft negative

“Limited proprietary intelligence — primarily an aggregator, not a producer” Kimi K2 · Threat intel · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Anomali ThreatStream, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Anomali ThreatStream was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Recorded Future36 of 4016Not in the top three

ThreatConnect30 of 401Not in the top three

MISP15 of 405Not in the top three

Flashpoint14 of 400Not in the top three

OpenCTI12 of 403Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence12 of 400Not in the top three

Google Threat Intelligence10 of 401Not in the top three

Cyble Vision10 of 400Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Adversary Intelligence9 of 400Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence9 of 400Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Anomali ThreatStream. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 40 answers that named Anomali ThreatStream and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

analyticsinsight.net24

esecurityplanet.com22

learn.g2.com21

upguard.com21

cyware.com18

b2breviews.com15

devopsschool.com11

decryptiondigest.com10

shadowdragon.io10

tech-insider.org10

162 of the 162 domain citations in answers naming Anomali ThreatStream came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

esecurityplanet.com/products/threat-intelligence-platforms21

learn.g2.com/best-threat-intelligence-tools21

upguard.com/blog/best-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-vendors20

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/best-threat-intelligence-platforms18

cyware.com/blog/top-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-solutions16

b2breviews.com/threat-intelligence-platforms15

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/10-best-threat-intelligence-platforms-in-202613

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-threat-intelligence-tools-globally10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Anomali ThreatStream

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Anomali ThreatStream; a claim can dispute any of them.

Anomali Threatstream 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Anomali ThreatStream's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Anomali ThreatStream, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at anomali.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.