Index › Security operations › DRP › Flare vs Rapid7 Threat Command

Digital risk protection · October 2026 Edition

Flare vs Rapid7 Threat Command

Zero of fourteen models named Flare first on the direct prompt; one named Rapid7 Threat Command. Flare was named by six of the fourteen models and Rapid7 Threat Command by seven and both carry 12 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.

Flare

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Rapid7 Threat Command

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.

Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.

Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.

Labels1212Equal, which is what makes the shares comparable.

The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Flare reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.UpGuard BreachSight was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. UpGuard BreachSight vs Flare · UpGuard BreachSight vs Rapid7 Threat Command · ZeroFox vs Flare

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital risk protection page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.

FlareFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRapid7 Threat Command

Direct01

Paraphrase00

Comparative00

Budget-constrained10

Scale-constrained00

Negative00

Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Flare and Rapid7 Threat Command were named in the same answer ten times, of the 48 answers naming Flare and the 40 naming Rapid7 Threat Command. In those answers Rapid7 Threat Command took the first choice zero times and Flare zero.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Flare and Rapid7 Threat Command stood in it.

Model	Direct	Paraphrase	Comparative	Budget-constrained	Scale-constrained	Negative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B

Flare

Rapid7 Threat Command

first choice

named as an alternative

argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Flare on the left and Rapid7 Threat Command on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Flare and Rapid7 Threat Command stood in it.

Rapid7 Threat Command first, Flare not the choice

1 of 14 modelsFlare was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.

Perplexity SonarRapid7 Threat Command, UpGuard BreachSight alternatives: CybelAngel

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.

Claude Haiku 4.5Cyble Vision alternatives: BlueVoyant Sky, CrowdStrike Falcon, Rapid7 Threat Command, UpGuard BreachSight

Gemini 3.5 FlashSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: Flare, UpGuard BreachSight, ZeroFox

Grok 4.1 FastUpGuard BreachSight alternatives: Rapid7 Threat Command, ZeroFox

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.

GPT-5.4 miniZeroFox alternatives: Bitsight, Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard BreachSight

Mistral SmallUpGuard BreachSight alternatives: Kaduu, Recorded Future

DeepSeek V4 FlashUpGuard BreachSight alternatives: Netcraft, Rapid7, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence, ZeroFox

Llama 4 MaverickFortra Brand Protection alternatives: Kaduu, Recorded Future, UpGuard BreachSight

Qwen 3.7 FlashRapid7 alternatives: Corvus Logic, Cyberhaven, Recorded Future, ThreatConnect

Kimi K2UpGuard BreachSight alternatives: Fortra Brand Protection, ZeroFox

GLM 4.7 FlashXUpGuard BreachSight alternatives: Bolster

MiniMax M2.5UpGuard BreachSight alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, Group-IB Digital Risk Protection, Recorded Future, ZeroFox

GPT-6 LunaCybelAngel Core alternatives: Bolster, BrandShield, ZeroFox

Muse Glimmer 30BUpGuard BreachSight alternatives: CybelAngel

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.

Small business

Flare leads by six points.

Flare#4 of 8

Rapid7 Threat Command#– of 8

The full small business standing →

Mid-marketThe figures above

Level: the same share of first choices.

Flare#6 of 11

Rapid7 Threat Command#7 of 11

The full mid-market standing →

Enterprise

Level: the same share of first choices.

Flare#– of 9

Rapid7 Threat Command#– of 9

The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Flare

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“I'd trial Flare first—but I wouldn't commit until you get a written quote” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Rapid7 Threat Command

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“the strongest default choice is Rapid7 Threat Command or UpGuard” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice

Also compared

UpGuard BreachSight vs Flare UpGuard BreachSight vs Rapid7 Threat Command ZeroFox vs Flare ZeroFox vs Rapid7 Threat Command SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Flare SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Rapid7 Threat Command BrandShield vs Flare BrandShield vs Rapid7 Threat Command Recorded Future vs Flare Recorded Future vs Rapid7 Threat Command Flare vs Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection Rapid7 Threat Command vs Proofpoint Digital Risk Protection All twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full DRP standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.