| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity governance | Identity and access | 9% | 3 of 76 | 3% | 31 | accepted challenger | ▲+9Since September 2026: 2% → 11%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer identity and access management | Identity and access | 0% | 39 of 70 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Frontegg at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Non-human identity management | Identity and access | 0% | 95 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by JumpCloud at 14% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGA | 2% | 11% | ▲+9Since September 2026: 2% → 11%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 3 of 76 |
| CIAM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 47 → 39 of 70 |
| NHI management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 95 of 128, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I would recommend Omada Identity Cloud if your priority is a true identity governance and administration (IGA) platform” Perplexity Sonar · IGA · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting your evaluation with Omada Identity Cloud because it's specifically designed for your segment” Kimi K2 · IGA · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Omada or Zluri as they balance functionality with mid-market appropriateness” MiniMax M2.5 · IGA · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Omada or Zluri for their balance of features and ease of use” MiniMax M2.5 · IGA · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise Solutions to Avoid on a Tight Budget ... Better for large, complex organizations” Kimi K2 · IGA · budget prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 73 of the 75 answers that named Omada Identity and are not a share of its labels.
310 of the 310 domain citations in answers naming Omada Identity came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Omada Identity's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: omadaidentity.com/de/omada-identity-de, omadaidentity.com/products/omada-identity, omadaidentity.com/de/omada-identity-cloud-de, omadaidentity.com/products/omada-identity-cloud, omadaidentity.com/products/omada-identity-cloud-private. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Omada Identity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Omada Identity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Omada Identity by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Omada Identity is among the products AI models recommend first in Identity governance this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.