AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Lumos · October 2026 Edition
5 categories · Ranked

Lumos

84Judge labels
16First choices
7Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in IGA for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 76 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
4 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 24 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Lumos →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In iga · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Lumos for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Identity governanceIdentity and access12%2 of 764%24accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 20% → 13%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
SaaS management platformsIT operations and endpoint0%23 of 6427%11criticized challenger
Non-human identity managementIdentity and access0%68 of 1280%2under 10 labels · led by JumpCloud at 14%
Enterprise browsersSecurity operations0%55 of 800%1under 10 labels · led by Google Password Manager at 26%
SaaS security posture managementSecurity operations0%69 of 950%1under 10 labels · led by Wing Security at 30%

Movement

Since September 2026, Lumos held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · IGA · by segment

Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 84
Mid-market▼−7Since September 2026: 20% → 13%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
13%from 20% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 1 → 2 of 71
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 5 of 70

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
IGA20%13%▼−7Since September 2026: 20% → 13%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 1 → 2 of 76
SaaS management0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 23 of 64, unchanged
NHI management0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 68 of 128, unchanged
Enterprise browsers0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 55 of 80, unchanged
SSPM0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 69 of 95, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Lumos across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini01113
Gemini 3.5 Flash25029
Perplexity Sonar11002
Grok 4.2010203
Mistral Small02103
DeepSeek V4 Flash01203
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash21003
Kimi K212115
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B12003

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels6
Paraphrase10 labels4
Comparative21 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labels1
Scale-constrained21 labels5
Negative11 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative84 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Lumos is best for mid-market companies focused on automating access requests and approvals across SaaS apps” Muse Glimmer 30B · IGA · direct prompt · first choice
“Zluri, Lumos, ConductorOne — Built for mid-market; faster deployments ($), lower administrative burden” Qwen 3.7 Flash · IGA · scale prompt · first choice
“the best identity governance platform is usually Lumos if you want the fastest path to value” Perplexity Sonar · IGA · direct prompt · first choice
“If your top priority is cutting SaaS costs while getting SOC 2 ready: Go with Lumos.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“mention missing features or limited customization for BetterCloud, Productiv, Lumos, and Zluri” GPT-5.4 mini · SaaS management · negative prompt · soft negative
“Lumos is massive feature overkill and will cost you far more than you need to spend.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SaaS management · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution for Hard-Compliance Environments... Feature gaps for legacy/on-prem systems” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · negative prompt · soft negative
“users report significant integration issues” Kimi K2 · SaaS management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lumos, over the 84 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lumos was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud47 of 846Not among the top eight
Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud41 of 843Not among the top eight
Torii19 of 843Not among the top eight
Zylo18 of 847Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lumos. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 80 of the 84 answers that named Lumos and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

lumos.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lumos takes 12% of first choices and Microsoft Entra ID Governance takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “identity governance platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “identity governance platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
49,500 a month (“lumos”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2,739 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 26,754 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,005 · 144 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,344
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 13 clicks and $14 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
59 ads · 57 text, 1 image, 1 video · 23 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2025, as Lumos App Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 47 in the year, 12 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
12%
rank 2 of 76 in IGA
Segment leader
25%
Microsoft Entra ID Governance
First choices
16 across its categories
Named in
84 answers
Its own site cited
in 80 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on lumos.com
1,478
subdomains included
Content
266
counted in the table below
Documentation
400
Product · Integration
15 · 227
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog20572026-09-22
Report or ebook1902025-11-01
Webinar or virtual event1702025-07-28
Comparison1432026-07-14
Template or tool902026-01-14
Conference or event102026-02-24
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page lumos.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Lumos

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Lumos; a claim can dispute any of them.
Lumos (by Island) 1

Follow Lumos

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Lumos is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The autonomous identity platform. Agents that continuously govern access for every human, machine, and AI.
For
IT and security teams
Free plan or trial
a free identity assessment today lumos.com
Integrations claimed
300 lumos.com
Customers named
ProsperMarqetaRokuSun Country AirlinesCheggNetskopeGitLabPinterest
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, certifications, hosting

What Lumos's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: lumos.com, lumos.com/pricing, trust.lumos.com, lumos.com/products/albus, lumos.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lumos's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lumos, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lumos by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Lumos is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lumos, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lumos.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Lumos is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Lumos is among the products AI models recommend first in Identity governance this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Identity governance, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/identity/identity-governance/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/lumos--identity-governance-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Identity governance, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Identity governance standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Identity governance, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/identity/identity-governance/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/lumos--identity-governance-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Identity governance, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Identity governance standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Identity governance, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/identity/identity-governance/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/lumos--identity-governance-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Identity governance, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Identity governance standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.