Every category where a model named ConductorOne for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Identity governance	Identity and access	8%	4 of 77	10%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ConductorOne yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ConductorOne across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	0	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels2

Paraphrase4 labels2

Comparative8 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labels3

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start your proof-of-concept (POC) with ConductorOne or Lumos if your team is small and you want high speed” Qwen 3.7 Flash · IGA · direct prompt · first choice

“Top Tool: ConductorOne ... Best for: Highly-regulated mid-market B2B companies that need strict compliance” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Lumos, ConductorOne, Zilla Security — purpose-built for mid-market SaaS environments” Kimi K2 · IGA · scale prompt · first choice

“ConductorOne is highly optimized for this exact mid-market pain point.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Outages at scale, hidden costs (CEL queries/add-ons), gaps in non-human ID/security posture.” Grok 4.1 Fast · IGA · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ConductorOne, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ConductorOne was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud24 of 311Not in the top three

Lumos22 of 311Not in the top three

SailPoint21 of 312Not in the top three

Okta Identity Governance21 of 310Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra ID Governance19 of 310Not in the top three

AccessOwl13 of 318Not in the top three

One Identity Manager10 of 311Not in the top three

Zluri9 of 311Not in the top three

JumpCloud8 of 312Not in the top three

SailPoint IdentityIQ8 of 310Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ConductorOne. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 31 answers that named ConductorOne and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

idenhq.com16

aimultiple.com15

corma.io13

expertinsights.com12

solutionsreview.com12

accessowl.com11

gartner.com11

lumos.com10

zluri.com10

multiplierhq.com8

118 of the 118 domain citations in answers naming ConductorOne came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aimultiple.com/iga-solutions15

accessowl.com/blog/buyers-guide-for-iga-tools-by-team-size11

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-identity-governance-and-administrati11

gartner.com/reviews/market/identity-governance-administration11

solutionsreview.com/identity-management/the-best-identity-governance-tools-and-vendors-211

corma.io/blog/top-10-iam-solutions-for-smbs-and-mid-size-companies-20268

idenhq.com/en/blog/12-best-iga-vendors-in-2026-complete-comparison8

corma.io/blog/best-iga-solutions-for-mid-market-companies7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ConductorOne

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ConductorOne; a claim can dispute any of them.

ConductorOne (C1) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ConductorOne's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ConductorOne, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at conductorone.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.