Every category where a model named Oracle Identity Governance for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Identity governance	Identity and access	0%	75 of 77	57%	7	under 10 labels · led by Lumos at 20%
Workforce identity and SSO	Identity and access	0%	38 of 48	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle Identity Governance yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle Identity Governance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	2	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative21 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Deep Oracle-ecosystem integration and compliance reporting | Oracle Identity Governance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · IGA · comparative prompt · alternative

“often strongest in Oracle-heavy environments” GPT-5.4 mini · IGA · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Verdict: Avoid if you are building a modern, cloud-first, or hybrid security stack.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid Oracle IGA if you're cloud-native.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · IGA · negative prompt · hard negative

“falls into the legacy, enterprise-stack category, so it is best treated cautiously if you want a modern, lightweight rollout” Perplexity Sonar · IGA · negative prompt · soft negative

“enterprise-scale tools that can be over-engineered for smaller or mid-market organizations” Perplexity Sonar · Workforce identity · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Identity Governance, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Identity Governance was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud22 of 311Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra ID Governance15 of 311Not in the top three

SailPoint13 of 314Not in the top three

IBM Security Verify Governance13 of 310Not in the top three

Okta Identity Governance12 of 310Not in the top three

One Identity Manager11 of 310Not in the top three

IBM ISAM7 of 310Not in the top three

Okta6 of 311Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra ID6 of 310Not in the top three

Omada Identity6 of 310Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Identity Governance. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 31 answers that named Oracle Identity Governance and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

corma.io13

gartner.com12

expertinsights.com11

aimultiple.com10

lumos.com10

startwithidentity.com10

zluri.com9

idenhq.com8

oneidentity.com7

saviynt.com7

Ninety-seven of the ninety-seven domain citations in answers naming Oracle Identity Governance came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aimultiple.com/iga-solutions10

corma.io/blog/top-10-iam-solutions-for-smbs-and-mid-size-companies-202610

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-identity-governance-and-administrati10

gartner.com/reviews/market/identity-governance-administration10

lumos.com/identity-matters/identity-governance/sailpoint-competitors-and-alternatives7

oneidentity.com/learn/top-5-identity-governance-and-administration-tools-in-2025.aspx6

idenhq.com/en/blog/identity-governance-and-administration-complete5

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-iga-tools5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle Identity Governance

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Identity Governance; a claim can dispute any of them.

Oracle Identity 1Oracle Identity Governance (OIG) 1Oracle Identity Governance (OIG/OIM) 1Oracle Identity Manager 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Identity Governance's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Identity Governance, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.