Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 75 → 82 of 84
Oracle · 3 categories · RankedOracle Identity Governance
51Judge labels
0First choices
34Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in IGA for mid-market buyers
Rank 76 of 76 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 55% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Oracle Identity Governance →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business87 of 89
0%11 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market76 of 76
0%11 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise76 of 76
0%22 labels
criticized challenger
In iga · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Oracle Identity Governance for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity governance | Identity and access | 0% | 76 of 76 | 55% | 11 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer identity and access management | Identity and access | 0% | 41 of 70 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Frontegg at 21% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Workforce identity and SSO | Identity and access | 0% | 42 of 44 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID at 46% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Oracle Identity Governance held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · IGA · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 73 → 71 of 71
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 20 → 70 of 70
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGA | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 73 → 76 of 76 |
| CIAM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 41 of 70, unchanged |
| Workforce identity | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 36 → 42 of 44 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Oracle Identity Governance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Oracle Identity Governance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative28 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative51 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Saviynt/CyberArk/Oracle for cloud infrastructure, data access and privileged-heavy scenarios” Muse Glimmer 30B · IGA · comparative prompt · alternative
“OpenText, Oracle, IBM, Broadcom, and EmpowerID offer strong alternatives” Mistral Small · IGA · comparative prompt · alternative
“Enterprise-focused, integrated with Oracle ecosystem” Grok 4.20 · IGA · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid entirely if you're starting fresh: ... Oracle OIG (turnkey, but dated and expensive)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · IGA · negative prompt · hard negative
“The Legacy Giants (Avoid for Modern/Greenfield Deployments)... Approaching End-of-Life” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · negative prompt · hard negative
“considered over-engineered for small to mid-size companies (100-500 employees)” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce identity · negative prompt · hard negative
“Oracle Identity Governance older on-prem versions (complex, resource-heavy)” Kimi K2 · IGA · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Identity Governance, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Identity Governance was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Identity Governance, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Identity Governance was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Identity Governance. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 47 of the 51 answers that named Oracle Identity Governance and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
expertinsights.com25
cybersecuritynews.com18
lumos.com18
aimultiple.com16
startwithidentity.com15
credentialgovernance.avatier.com13
idenhq.com13
saviynt.com13
securityboulevard.com13
zluri.com13
157 of the 157 domain citations in answers naming Oracle Identity Governance came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Oracle Identity Governance stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Oracle Identity Governance stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 50 a month (“oracle identity governance”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Oracle's site (oracle.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 76 of 76 in IGA
Segment leader
25%
Microsoft Entra ID Governance
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 51 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 47 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Oracle Identity Governance
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Identity Governance; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oracle Identity Governance (OIG) 5Oracle 1Oracle (Identity Governance) 1Oracle Identity Governance (OIG/OIM) 1Oracle Identity Manager 1
Follow Oracle Identity Governance
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Oracle is the company behind Oracle Identity Governance.ShowHide
The company
Oracle is the company behind Oracle Identity Governance.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- one of the products of the Oracle Identity Governance Suite
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Oracle Identity Governance's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: learn.oracle.com/ols/course/oracle-identity-governance-12c-essentials/38560/67772, learn.oracle.com/ols/course/introduction-to-oracle-identity-governance/89350/105654, learn.oracle.com/ols/learning-path/oracle-identity-governance-essentials/89350/105627, learn.oracle.com/ols/course/oig-oracle-identity-analytics-11g-role-mining/89350/94499, learn.oracle.com/ols/learning-path/oracle-identity-governance-12c-administration/38560/68776. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Identity Governance's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Identity Governance, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle Identity Governance by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Oracle Identity Governance is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle Identity Governance, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.