Identity governance · October 2026 Edition
Omada Identity vs ConductorOne
Three of fourteen models named Omada Identity first on the direct prompt; one named ConductorOne. Omada Identity was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and ConductorOne by eight and Omada Identity carries 31 labels and ConductorOne 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share9%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%13%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels3115A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Omada Identity reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Entra ID Governance was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs Omada Identity · Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs ConductorOne · Lumos vs Omada Identity
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the identity governance page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Omada IdentityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsConductorOne
Direct31
Paraphrase31
Comparative00
Budget-constrained001 against Omada Identity
Scale-constrained01
Negative002 against ConductorOne
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Omada Identity and ConductorOne were named in the same answer twelve times, of the 75 answers naming Omada Identity and the 46 naming ConductorOne. In those answers ConductorOne took the first choice two times and Omada Identity one.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Omada Identity and ConductorOne stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Omada Identity ConductorOne first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Omada Identity on the left and ConductorOne on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Omada Identity and ConductorOne stood in it.
Omada Identity first, ConductorOne not the choice
3 of 14 modelsConductorOne was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Llama 4 MaverickOmada Identity alternatives: One Identity Manager
Kimi K2Omada Identity alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Netwrix Identity Manager, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
MiniMax M2.5Omada Identity, Zluri alternatives: SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Tools4ever HelloID
ConductorOne first, Omada Identity not the choice
1 of 14 modelsOmada Identity was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashConductorOne, Lumos alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, tenfold
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice alternatives: ConductorOne, Lumos, Omada Identity, Zluri, tenfold
Perplexity SonarLumos alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Omada Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
Grok 4.1 FastSaviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud alternatives: ConductorOne, Microsoft Entra ID Governance, One Identity Manager, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Tools4ever HelloID
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID Governance alternatives: ConductorOne, Okta Identity Governance, Omada Identity
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Entra ID Governance alternatives: Iden, Omada Identity, One Identity Manager, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud, Zluri, tenfold
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Entra ID Governance alternatives: ConductorOne, Okta Identity Governance, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
Muse Glimmer 30BLumos alternatives: Iden, Linx, Omada Identity, One Identity Manager, Opal Security, Zluri
Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniOkta Identity Governance alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Gemini 3.5 FlashC1, Lumos alternatives: AccessOwl, Corma, Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Okta Identity Governance, Zilla Security
Mistral SmallOkta Identity Governance, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud alternatives: Lumos, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
ConductorOne leads by five points.
ConductorOne5%#6 of 12Omada Identity0%#9 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Omada Identity leads at mid-market.
Omada Identity9%#3 of 13ConductorOne5%#6 of 13Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Omada Identity2%#5 of 8ConductorOne2%#– of 8What the models said about Omada Identity
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Enterprise Solutions to Avoid on a Tight Budget ... Better for large, complex organizations” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“I would recommend Omada Identity Cloud if your priority is a true identity governance and administration (IGA) platform” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting your evaluation with Omada Identity Cloud because it's specifically designed for your segment” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Omada or Zluri as they balance functionality with mid-market appropriateness” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about ConductorOne
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Outages at scale, coverage gaps ... CEL query complexity, add-on pricing.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“these lightweight tools will struggle to bridge the gap” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Zluri, Lumos, ConductorOne — Built for mid-market; faster deployments ($), lower administrative burden” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend ConductorOne as a strong starting point.” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Recommendation: Lumos or ConductorOne” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs Omada IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID Governance vs ConductorOneLumos vs Omada IdentityLumos vs ConductorOneOmada Identity vs Okta Identity GovernanceOmada Identity vs ZluriOmada Identity vs One Identity ManagerOmada Identity vs JumpCloudOkta Identity Governance vs ConductorOneZluri vs ConductorOneConductorOne vs One Identity ManagerConductorOne vs JumpCloudAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full IGA standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.