Every category where a model named Zluri for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Identity governance	Identity and access	7%	5 of 77	0%	18	accepted challenger
IT asset management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	19 of 61	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Snipe-IT at 24%
Workforce identity and SSO	Identity and access	0%	22 of 48	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zluri yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zluri across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	4	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	4	1	7
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct17 labels4

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained6 labels2

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Lumos or Zluri currently represent the best balance of features, ease of deployment, and operational simplicity” MiniMax M2.5 · IGA · direct prompt · first choice

“If you have a diverse SaaS stack and want modern, fast, low-overhead governance: Go with Lumos or Zluri.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · IGA · direct prompt · first choice

“Zluri is best for mid-market companies looking for a simple, SaaS-first IGA solution with strong SaaS discovery” Claude Haiku 4.5 · IGA · direct prompt · first choice

“modern, SaaS-first options like Lumos, Zluri, Linx, Opal Security, and Iden ... built for your segment” DeepSeek V4 Flash · IGA · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zluri, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zluri was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lumos25 of 427Not in the top three

Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud21 of 421Not in the top three

SailPoint20 of 422Not in the top three

Okta Identity Governance18 of 422Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra ID Governance16 of 423Not in the top three

Opal Security10 of 420Not in the top three

ServiceNow IT Asset Management9 of 424Not in the top three

ConductorOne9 of 423Not in the top three

One Identity Manager9 of 420Not in the top three

Iden8 of 423Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zluri. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 42 answers that named Zluri and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

corma.io20

gartner.com20

linx.security17

expertinsights.com16

zluri.comYour site16

aimultiple.com15

solutionsreview.com14

accessowl.com11

idenhq.com11

lumos.com11

135 of the 151 domain citations in answers naming Zluri came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/identity-governance-administration19

corma.io/blog/best-iga-solutions-for-mid-market-companies17

linx.security/blog/top-10-iga-tools-a-modern-identity-governance-buyers-guide15

aimultiple.com/iga-solutions14

solutionsreview.com/identity-management/the-best-identity-governance-tools-and-vendors-212

accessowl.com/blog/buyers-guide-for-iga-tools-by-team-size11

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-identity-governance-and-administrati10

oneidentity.com/learn/top-5-identity-governance-and-administration-tools-in-2025.aspx10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zluri's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zluri, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zluri.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.