Every category where a model named Okta Identity Governance for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Identity governance	Identity and access	3%	8 of 77	34%	35	criticized challenger
Privileged access management	Identity and access	0%	47 of 74	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine PAM360 at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Okta Identity Governance yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Okta Identity Governance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	2	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	4	0	2	6
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	0	1	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2	4
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	2	3
Kimi K2	0	3	0	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	1	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct21 labels2

Paraphrase19 labels3

Comparative25 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labelsNone

Scale-constrained13 labelsNone

Negative21 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative111 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“My Top Recommendation: Okta Identity Governance (OIG) or SailPoint IdentityNow” DeepSeek V4 Flash · IGA · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Okta Identity Governance is the safest general pick for a mid-sized B2B company” Perplexity Sonar · IGA · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“For organizations already standardized on Okta for SSO and authentication, shared data model, one vendor relationship, and faster initial rollout are advantages.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · IGA · comparative prompt · alternative

“Top Tool: Okta Identity Governance (OIG) ... The Catch: OIG and Entra ID Governance can be expensive relative to the depth of features” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Okta Identity Governance: $108-$132/user/year — expensive for its feature set” DeepSeek V4 Flash · IGA · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid if you are a massive, highly regulated enterprise... However, they are highly recommended if you are a cloud-first, mid-sized business” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · negative prompt · soft negative

“the sources note gaps in deep entitlement visibility, on-prem connectivity, and customization compared with dedicated IGA platforms” Perplexity Sonar · IGA · negative prompt · soft negative

“Limitations: Governance automation only works for SCIM-connected apps; estimated 75-85% of apps remain outside SCIM coverage” MiniMax M2.5 · IGA · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Okta Identity Governance, over the 111 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Okta Identity Governance was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud82 of 1118Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra ID Governance72 of 11110Not in the top three

SailPoint67 of 11116Not in the top three

One Identity Manager43 of 1110Not in the top three

Lumos40 of 11110Not in the top three

Omada Identity28 of 1111Not in the top three

AccessOwl22 of 11112Not in the top three

ConductorOne21 of 1117Not in the top three

Iden20 of 1119Not in the top three

Zluri18 of 1110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Okta Identity Governance. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 91 of the 111 answers that named Okta Identity Governance and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com64

idenhq.com54

zluri.com48

aimultiple.com47

oneidentity.com42

solutionsreview.com42

lumos.com39

corma.io36

expertinsights.com35

startwithidentity.com33

440 of the 440 domain citations in answers naming Okta Identity Governance came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/identity-governance-administration62

aimultiple.com/iga-solutions47

oneidentity.com/learn/top-5-identity-governance-and-administration-tools-in-2025.aspx41

solutionsreview.com/identity-management/the-best-identity-governance-tools-and-vendors-240

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-identity-governance-and-administrati32

corma.io/blog/best-iga-solutions-for-mid-market-companies28

idenhq.com/en/blog/identity-governance-and-administration-complete27

accessowl.com/blog/buyers-guide-for-iga-tools-by-team-size26

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Okta Identity Governance

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Okta Identity Governance; a claim can dispute any of them.

Okta Identity Governance (OIG) 10Okta Governance 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Okta Identity Governance's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Okta Identity Governance, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at okta.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.