Index › Vendors › IBM Security Verify Governance · September 2026 Edition

IBM · 1 category · Named, not ranked

IBM Security Verify Governance

19Judge labels

0First choices

9Negative labels

10 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. IBM Security Verify Governance was named 8 times in IGA, where Lumos led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business75 of 81

under the label threshold

Mid-market62 of 77

under the label threshold

Enterprise56 of 69

under the label threshold

In iga · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named IBM Security Verify Governance for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Identity governance	Identity and access	0%	62 of 77	38%	8	under 10 labels · led by Lumos at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for IBM Security Verify Governance yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated IBM Security Verify Governance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Governance tightly coupled with IBM security suite | IBM Security Verify Governance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · IGA · comparative prompt · alternative

“IBM remains a significant enterprise governance vendor” GPT-5.4 mini · IGA · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“IBM Security Identity Governance & Intelligence (IGI) – CVE‑2019‑3863 (libssh2 integer overflow)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · IGA · negative prompt · hard negative

“Verdict: Avoid if you are building a modern, cloud-first, or hybrid security stack.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · negative prompt · hard negative

“The "Legacy" Tier – Old Guard with Modernization Risks” DeepSeek V4 Flash · IGA · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as IBM Security Verify Governance, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM Security Verify Governance was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud16 of 191Not in the top three

Okta Identity Governance14 of 190Not in the top three

Oracle Identity Governance13 of 190Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra ID Governance12 of 191Not in the top three

One Identity Manager11 of 190Not in the top three

SailPoint8 of 194Not in the top three

Omada Identity7 of 190Not in the top three

Symantec Identity Governance and Administration7 of 190Not in the top three

ConductorOne4 of 190Not in the top three

Lumos4 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named IBM Security Verify Governance. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 19 answers that named IBM Security Verify Governance and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aimultiple.com11

oneidentity.com10

expertinsights.com8

gartner.com8

startwithidentity.com8

idenhq.com7

zluri.com7

sailpoint.com6

saviynt.com6

uinat.com6

No domain is on file for IBM Security Verify Governance, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

aimultiple.com/iga-solutions11

oneidentity.com/learn/top-5-identity-governance-and-administration-tools-in-2025.aspx9

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-identity-governance-and-administrati8

gartner.com/reviews/market/identity-governance-administration7

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-iga-tools7

uinat.com/rankings/top-identity-governance-platforms-20266

solutionsreview.com/identity-management/the-best-identity-governance-tools-and-vendors-25

idenhq.com/en/blog/identity-governance-and-administration-complete4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as IBM Security Verify Governance

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as IBM Security Verify Governance; a claim can dispute any of them.

IBM Security IGI 1IBM Security Identity Governance 1IBM Security Identity Governance & Intelligence (IGI) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM Security Verify Governance's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM Security Verify Governance, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.