Identity governance · October 2026 Edition
Lumos vs Omada Identity
Four of fourteen models named Lumos first on the direct prompt; three named Omada Identity. Lumos was named by ten of the fourteen models and Omada Identity by fourteen and Lumos carries 24 labels and Omada Identity 31, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share12%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%3%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels2431A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Lumos reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Entra ID Governance was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs Lumos · Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs Omada Identity · Lumos vs Okta Identity Governance
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the identity governance page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LumosFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOmada Identity
Direct43
Paraphrase23
Comparative00
Budget-constrained001 against Omada Identity
Scale-constrained20
Negative001 against Lumos
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Lumos and Omada Identity were named in the same answer twenty-two times, of the 84 answers naming Lumos and the 75 naming Omada Identity. In those answers Omada Identity took the first choice one time and Lumos six.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Lumos and Omada Identity stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Lumos Omada Identity first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Lumos on the left and Omada Identity on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Lumos and Omada Identity stood in it.
Lumos first, Omada Identity an alternative
4 of 14 modelsOmada Identity was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashC1, Lumos alternatives: AccessOwl, Corma, Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Okta Identity Governance, Zilla Security
Perplexity SonarLumos alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Omada Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
Qwen 3.7 FlashConductorOne, Lumos alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, tenfold
Muse Glimmer 30BLumos alternatives: Iden, Linx, Omada Identity, One Identity Manager, Opal Security, Zluri
Omada Identity first, Lumos not the choice
3 of 14 modelsLumos was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Llama 4 MaverickOmada Identity alternatives: One Identity Manager
Kimi K2Omada Identity alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Netwrix Identity Manager, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
MiniMax M2.5Omada Identity, Zluri alternatives: SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Tools4ever HelloID
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice alternatives: ConductorOne, Lumos, Omada Identity, Zluri, tenfold
Mistral SmallOkta Identity Governance, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud alternatives: Lumos, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID Governance alternatives: ConductorOne, Okta Identity Governance, Omada Identity
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Entra ID Governance alternatives: Iden, Omada Identity, One Identity Manager, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud, Zluri, tenfold
Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniOkta Identity Governance alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Grok 4.1 FastSaviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud alternatives: ConductorOne, Microsoft Entra ID Governance, One Identity Manager, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Tools4ever HelloID
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Entra ID Governance alternatives: ConductorOne, Okta Identity Governance, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Lumos leads by eight points.
Lumos8%#4 of 12Omada Identity0%#9 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
What the models said about Lumos
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Caution for Hard-Compliance Environments... Feature gaps for legacy/on-prem systems” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Lumos is best for mid-market companies focused on automating access requests and approvals across SaaS apps” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Zluri, Lumos, ConductorOne — Built for mid-market; faster deployments ($), lower administrative burden” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“the best identity governance platform is usually Lumos if you want the fastest path to value” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Omada Identity
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Enterprise Solutions to Avoid on a Tight Budget ... Better for large, complex organizations” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“I would recommend Omada Identity Cloud if your priority is a true identity governance and administration (IGA) platform” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting your evaluation with Omada Identity Cloud because it's specifically designed for your segment” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Omada or Zluri as they balance functionality with mid-market appropriateness” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs LumosMicrosoft Entra ID Governance vs Omada IdentityLumos vs Okta Identity GovernanceLumos vs ZluriLumos vs ConductorOneLumos vs One Identity ManagerLumos vs JumpCloudOmada Identity vs Okta Identity GovernanceOmada Identity vs ZluriOmada Identity vs ConductorOneOmada Identity vs One Identity ManagerOmada Identity vs JumpCloudAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full IGA standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.