| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity governance | Identity and access | 2% | 14 of 76 | 42% | 52 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGA | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 14 of 76 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose SailPoint or Saviynt if you are a massive, global enterprise with a highly complex mix of legacy on-premises systems” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · comparative prompt · first choice
“SailPoint and Saviynt are the top enterprise leaders... Saviynt in cloud-native governance” Mistral Small · IGA · comparative prompt · first choice
“Saviynt is widely considered the strongest contender in the current market” Qwen 3.7 Flash · IGA · comparative prompt · first choice
“Often cited as best overall for mid-market to enterprise cloud-native IGA” Grok 4.20 · IGA · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise Solutions to Avoid on a Tight Budget ... Better for large, complex organizations” Kimi K2 · IGA · budget prompt · hard negative
“I would generally avoid SailPoint and Saviynt if budget is the primary constraint” GPT-5.4 mini · IGA · budget prompt · hard negative
“avoid legacy enterprise leaders like SailPoint (IdentityIQ) or Saviynt.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid SailPoint/Saviynt unless you have 2,000+ employees” Kimi K2 · IGA · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 141 of the 152 answers that named Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud and are not a share of its labels.
478 of the 515 domain citations in answers naming Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: exchange.saviynt.com/products/identity-center, exchange.saviynt.com/products/saviynt-for-wiz, exchange.saviynt.com/products/digital-identity, exchange.saviynt.com/products/wipro-iga-service, exchange.saviynt.com/collections/saviynt-developed. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: