IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud · September 2026 Edition
Saviynt · 1 category · Ranked

Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud

133Judge labels
5First choices
75Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in IGA for enterprise buyers
Rank 23 of 77 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 59% of its 41 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In iga · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Identity governanceIdentity and access2%23 of 7759%41criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500022
GPT-5.4 mini11013
Gemini 3.5 Flash01056
Perplexity Sonar02024
Grok 4.1 Fast01146
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01045
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K201034
GLM 4.7 FlashX03115
MiniMax M2.510012

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct25 labels4
Paraphrase18 labelsNone
Comparative28 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained19 labelsNone
Scale-constrained19 labels1
Negative24 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative133 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Saviynt is the safest default "best identity governance platform" recommendation for a mid-market B2B company” GPT-5.4 mini · IGA · direct prompt · first choice
“For regulated enterprises requiring comprehensive governance, SailPoint and Saviynt are the leading choices.” MiniMax M2.5 · IGA · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best For: Mid-to-large enterprises seeking a single-pane-of-glass approach for both basic governance and privileged access.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · comparative prompt · alternative
“Cloud-first, converged platform unifying IGA, granular application access, cloud security, and privileged access.” Mistral Small · IGA · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“heavy legacy enterprise platforms (like SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt, or One Identity)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · scale prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Legacy enterprise platforms (SailPoint, Saviynt)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · IGA · budget prompt · hard negative
“Powerful but built for large enterprises (5,000+ employees)” Kimi K2 · IGA · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid SailPoint/Saviynt/One Identity for pure mid-market” Grok 4.1 Fast · IGA · direct prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud, over the 133 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SailPoint91 of 13318Not in the top three
Okta Identity Governance82 of 1332Not in the top three
Microsoft Entra ID Governance77 of 13312Not in the top three
One Identity Manager60 of 1331Not in the top three
Lumos49 of 13316Not in the top three
Omada Identity39 of 1332Not in the top three
AccessOwl26 of 13317Not in the top three
ConductorOne24 of 1337Not in the top three
Iden23 of 1339Not in the top three
Oracle Identity Governance22 of 1330Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 111 of the 133 answers that named Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud; a claim can dispute any of them.
Saviynt 32Saviynt Identity Governance 2SailPoint/Saviynt 1Saviynt (Enterprise Identity Cloud) 1Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud (EIC) 1Saviynt IGA 1Saviynt Identity Governance & Administration 1Saviynt Identity Governance and Administration (IGA) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at saviynt.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack