Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 38 → 35 of 38
2 categories · Named, not rankedN-able
22Judge labels
0First choices
10Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. N-able was named 9 times in RMM and 1 other category, where NinjaOne led with 47%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business38 of 40
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market16 of 62
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise32 of 45
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
In rmm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named N-able for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remote monitoring and management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 16 of 62 | 25% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by NinjaOne at 47% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Vulnerability management platforms | Security operations | 0% | 54 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, N-able held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · RMM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 14 of 58
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 29 of 42
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 16 of 62 |
| Vuln management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 54 of 77, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated N-able across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated N-able across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“N-able N-central | Enterprise-grade, strong for larger environments | Historically MSP-focused but capable” DeepSeek V4 Flash · RMM · scale prompt · alternative
“Best For: Organizations specifically looking for deep network monitoring alongside device management.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · RMM · comparative prompt · alternative
“often positioned toward more complex, larger environments” Perplexity Sonar · RMM · comparative prompt · alternative
“The standard for larger, established enterprises.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · RMM · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid: NinjaOne and traditional RMMs (Kaseya, N-able) as they typically use per-endpoint pricing” Kimi K2 · RMM · budget prompt · hard negative
“most abused RMMs, which we stop with Full Content Inspection™ (FCI): • ConnectWise ScreenConnect • N-Able • FleetDeck • LogMeIn • PDQ Connect • Atera” Muse Glimmer 30B · RMM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as N-able, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and N-able was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as N-able, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and N-able was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named N-able. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named N-able and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
atera.com13
syncrosecure.com12
g2.com10
acronis.com9
comparitech.com9
connectwise.com9
geekflare.com8
learn.g2.com8
superops.com8
heimdalsecurity.com7
Ninety-three of the ninety-three domain citations in answers naming N-able came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
n-able.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, N-able takes 0% of first choices and NinjaOne takes 47%.ShowHide
Search and answers
n-able.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, N-able takes 0% of first choices and NinjaOne takes 47%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “rmm platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “rmm platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 4,400 a month (“n-able”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 296 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 46,175 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 15,028 · 745 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,147
- Paid Google search
- 10 searches its ads show for, about 315 clicks and $16,177 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 62 in RMM
Segment leader
47%
NinjaOne
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 22 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on n-able.com
9,927
subdomains included
Content
2,784
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,531
Product · Integration
306 · 118
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,010 | 0 | 2022-11-30 | MDR, RMM | |
| News or press | 362 | 0 | 2023-11-01 | RMM, EDR | |
| Comparison | 91 | 0 | 2021-05-01 | RMM, EDR | |
| Podcast or video | 85 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 74 | undated | MDR, EDR | ||
| Conference or event | 66 | 0 | 2012-03-01 | MDR, UEM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 35 | 0 | 2026-04-01 | MDR, RMM | |
| Case study | 29 | undated | MDR, EDR | ||
| Report or ebook | 18 | undated | RMM, EDR | ||
| Template or tool | 14 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-04-01Vulnerability management scan on demand webinar or virtual event
- 2026-03-01New script repository and on demand script execution for n sight and n central now in public preview webinar or virtual event
- 2023-11-01Announcement dnsf windows agent 1 10 7 news or press
- 2023-10-01Announcement dnsf windows agent 1 10 5 news or press
- 2022-11-30New monitoring admin area 1 mp4 blog
- 2022-11-08Trim fe388cc2 b98a 47cf 9267 a7c6bfef5990 1 mov blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- March 23, 2026 to March 26, 2026RSA Conference '26San Francisco · exhibited
As the event pages on n-able.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page n-able.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as N-able
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as N-able; a claim can dispute any of them.
N-able (N-central & N-sight) 2N-Able 1N-able (n-sight) 1N-able/N-central 1
Follow N-able
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
N-able is its own company.ShowHide
The company
N-able is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- End-to-End Cybersecurity and IT Management Solutions
- For
- MSPs and IT teams
- Free plan or trial
- Start a free trial n-able.com
- Integrations claimed
- 90 n-able.com/platform
- Customers named
- Entre Computer ServicesGlobal Imaging SolutionsOmega SystemsAiriamFortress Security Risk ManagementScott WarnerConnecting PointOIXIO IT
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, certifications, hosting
What N-able's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: n-able.com, n-able.com/topics/security, n-able.com/platform, n-able.com/customer-stories, n-able.com/es/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when N-able's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as N-able, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for N-able by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where N-able is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name N-able, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.