AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Developer platform › ASPM › Jit vs Wiz
Application security posture management · October 2026 Edition

Jit vs Wiz

Zero of fourteen models named Jit first on the direct prompt; one named Wiz. Jit was named by ten of the fourteen models and Wiz by nine and both carry 18 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.

Jit

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Wiz

accepted challenger

Named in sixteen categories this edition.

First-choice share6%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1818Equal, which is what makes the shares comparable.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Jit reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Aikido Security was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Aikido Security vs Jit · Aikido Security vs Wiz · Snyk vs Jit

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the application security posture management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
JitFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWiz
Direct011 against Wiz
Paraphrase30
Comparative11
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Jit · 1 against Wiz
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Jit and Wiz stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Jit Wiz first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Jit on the left and Wiz on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Jit and Wiz stood in it.

Wiz first, Jit not the choice

1 of 14 modelsJit was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Perplexity SonarWiz alternatives: ArmorCode, Checkmarx One, Snyk

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastAikido Security, Strobes ASPM alternatives: Jit, StackHawk
Qwen 3.7 FlashAikido Security alternatives: ArmorCode, Jit, Snyk AppRisk
Kimi K2Aikido Security, Snyk alternatives: Apiiro, Cycode ASPM, Jit, Semgrep

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Aikido Security alternatives: Cycode ASPM, Snyk
GPT-5.4 miniCycode ASPM alternatives: ArmorCode, Legit Security, Snyk AppRisk
Gemini 3.5 FlashAikido Security alternatives: ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, DefectDojo, Jit.io
Mistral SmallPhoenix Security alternatives: Aikido Security, Snyk AppRisk
DeepSeek V4 FlashAikido Security alternatives: Cycode ASPM, Jit.io, Legit Security, Snyk, Snyk AppRisk
Llama 4 MaverickAikido Security alternatives: ArmorCode, Snyk AppRisk
GLM 4.7 FlashXCycode ASPM, Snyk alternatives: Invicti ASPM, Strobes, Xygeni
MiniMax M2.5no first choice
GPT-6 LunaArmorCode alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Snyk AppRisk, Wiz ASPM
Muse Glimmer 30Bno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Jit0%#5 of 12
Wiz0%#– of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Jit leads by four points.
Jit6%#5 of 12
Wiz2%#7 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Wiz leads at enterprise.
Wiz4%#6 of 13
Jit2%#9 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Jit

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Users report integration issues—doesn't support all enterprise environments, requires extra manual setup. Also lacking customer support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-sized B2B companies: Start with Jit for its ease of use, built-in scanning, and developer-friendly approach.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Jit is a cloud-native, developer-first Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) and DevSecOps orchestration platform.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Jit is considered the best overall ASPM tool in 2026” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Wiz

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared
Aikido Security vs JitAikido Security vs WizSnyk vs JitSnyk vs WizDefectDojo vs JitDefectDojo vs WizCycode ASPM vs JitCycode ASPM vs WizJit vs ArmorCodeArmorCode vs WizAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full ASPM standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.