Zero of fourteen models named Jit first on the direct prompt; one named ArmorCode. Jit was named by ten of the fourteen models and ArmorCode by fourteen and Jit carries 18 labels and ArmorCode 33, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the application security posture management page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Jit and ArmorCode were named in the same answer twenty-seven times, of the 67 answers naming Jit and the 101 naming ArmorCode. In those answers ArmorCode took the first choice two times and Jit three.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Users report integration issues—doesn't support all enterprise environments, requires extra manual setup. Also lacking customer support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-sized B2B companies: Start with Jit for its ease of use, built-in scanning, and developer-friendly approach.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Jit is a cloud-native, developer-first Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) and DevSecOps orchestration platform.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Jit is considered the best overall ASPM tool in 2026” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Enterprise-grade ASPM platforms (such as ArmorCode, Cycode, and Apiiro) are incredibly powerful, but their pricing models are built for large enterprises and often start at tens of thousands of dollars” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Some aggregator-focused platforms like ArmorCode, Tromzo, and similar tools that primarily focus on ingesting and reporting rather than adding intelligence.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“ArmorCode is positioned as a vendor-neutral AppSec command centre that integrates with 100-plus security tools, deduplicates findings and is an aggregator only.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Wiz or ArmorCode if you are a cloud-native organization looking for a "single pane of glass"” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Many existing scanners; don’t want to replace them: start with ArmorCode and Veracode Risk Manager.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose ArmorCode if you have 30+ security tools ... it's the ultimate unification and automation engine.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.